Site map
- Consultations
- Login
- Register
- Accessibility
- Privacy
- Cookies
- Instructions
- Previous consultations
-
- Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
- Representation search for Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
-
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Vision, Overall Priorities and Objectives
-
- Representations made against 2.1
- Representations made against 2.2
- Representations made against 2.3
- Representations made against 1. What are your views on the Council's Vision?
- Representations made against Overall Priority 1 – Green to the Core
- Representations made against Overall Priority 2 – Live Well Locally
- Representations made against 2. What are your views on proposed twin Overall Priorities to be 'Green to the Core' and 'Live Well Locally'?
- Representations made against 3. What are your views on the key issues (listed at paragraph 2.13) that have been identified and is there anything significant missing?
- Representations made against 4. What are your views on the Council's objectives for the Local Plan?
- Representations made against 5. Are there any alternatives or additional objectives and/or the ways to achieve the objectives the Council should be considering?
- 3. Green to the Core
-
- Representations made against Proposed Policy GTC1: Net Zero Building Standards
- Representations made against 6. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for net zero standards and which parts of the policy do you support?
- Representations made against 7. How important is it for Rother to seek to set high standards?
- Representations made against 8. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy GTC2: Net Zero Retrofit Standards
- Representations made against 9. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for net zero refurbishment standards?
- Representations made against 10. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy GTC3: Construction Materials and Waste
- Representations made against 11. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for construction material and waste?
- Representations made against 12. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 13. What are your views on the proposed policy for water efficiency?
- Representations made against 14. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 15. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for heat networks?
- Representations made against 16. What would be your preferred approach to carry forward in the Local Plan?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy GTC6: Renewable and Low Carbon Energy
- Representations made against 17. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for Renewable and Low Carbon Energy?
- Representations made against 18. What are your views on identifying broad locations for wind development?
- Representations made against 19. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy GTC7: Local Nature Recovery Areas
- Representations made against 20. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for Local Nature Recovery Areas?
- Representations made against 21. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy GTC8: Biodiversity Net Gain
- Representations made against 22. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for Biodiversity Net Gain?
- Representations made against 23. What are your views on the Council going above the national minimum requirement of 10%?
- Representations made against 24. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy GTC9: High Weald National Landscape (AONB)
- Representations made against What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for the High Weald National Landscape?
- Representations made against Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- 4. Live Well Locally
-
- Representations made against 4.1
- Representations made against 4.2
- Representations made against 4.3
- Representations made against 4.4
- Representations made against 4.6
- Representations made against 4.7
- Representations made against 4.8
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL1: Compact Development
- Representations made against 27. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on compact development?
- Representations made against 28. What are your views on the area types and densities proposed as a key driver to Live Well Locally?
- Representations made against 29. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL2: Facilities & Services
- Representations made against 30. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on facilities and services?
- Representations made against 31. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 32. Specifically, what are your views on the proposed mix of local amenities and the requirement, within certain area types, for new development to be located within an 800m walk of these amenities?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL3: Walking, Wheeling, Cycling and Public Transport (Outside the Site)
- Representations made against 33. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on walking, wheeling, cycling and public transport (outside the site)?
- Representations made against 34. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 35. Specifically, what are your views on the requirements set regarding public transport, such as the 400m walking distance proximity requirement?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL4: Walking, Wheeling, Cycling & Public Transport (Within the Site)
- Representations made against 36. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on walking, wheeling, cycling and public transport (within the site)?
- Representations made against 37. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 38. Specifically, what are your views on the provision of Demand Responsive Transport, car clubs and car shares?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL5: Distinctive Places
- Representations made against 39. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on distinctive places?
- Representations made against 40. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 41. Specifically, what are your views on using the considerations in Building for a Healthy Life and Streets for a Healthy Life as a framework for assessing residential development?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL6: Built Form
- Representations made against 42. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on built form?
- Representations made against 43. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 44. Specifically, what are your views on prioritising solar orientation and form factor when designing new developments?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL7: Streets for All
- Representations made against 45. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on streets for all?
- Representations made against 46. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 47. Specifically, what are your views on using the ten 'Healthy Streets' indicators of the 'Healthy Streets Toolkit' when designing new streets?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LWL8: Multimodal Parking
- Representations made against 48. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on multimodal parking?
- Representations made against 49. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 50. Specifically, what are your views on communal 'remote' car parking?
- 5. Development Strategy and Principles
-
- Representations made against 5.5
- Representations made against 5.6
- Representations made against 5.7
- Representations made against Figure 9: Flood Risk Areas
- Representations made against Preferred Spatial Development Options:
- Representations made against 51. What are your views on the Council's preferred spatial development options?
- Representations made against 52. Do you have any comments on the merits of the alternative Spatial Development Options, that do not form part of the preferred development options – as explained in the background paper?
- Representations made against 53. Are there any other development options that the Council should consider as part of its Local Plan?
- Representations made against Proposed Strategy: Overall Spatial Development Strategy
- Representations made against 54. What are your views on the Council's proposed spatial development strategy and proposed minimum targets for housing and employment growth?
- Representations made against 55. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Vision for Bexhill
- Representations made against 56. What are your views on the vision for Bexhill?
- Representations made against 57. What are your views on the two broad locations for growth (west Bexhill and north Bexhill) and their growth potential in the Bexhill strategy area in figures 13, 14 & 15?
- Representations made against 58. What are your views on the potential sites identified in the draft HELAA that could accommodate more growth in Bexhill?
- Representations made against Vision for Hastings Fringes and Radial Settlements
- Representations made against 59. What are your views on the vision for Hastings Fringes and surrounding settlements?
- Representations made against 60. What are your views on the distribution and opportunities for growth in settlements within the sub-area in figures 17, 18 & 19?
- Representations made against 61. What are your views on the potential sites identified in the draft HELAA that could accommodate more growth in Hastings Fringes and surrounding settlements?
- Representations made against Vision for Battle and Surrounding Settlements
- Representations made against 62. What are your views on the vision for Battle and surrounding settlements?
- Representations made against 63. What are your views on the distribution and opportunities for growth in settlements within the sub-area in figures 21, 22 & 23?
- Representations made against 64. What are your views on the potential sites identified in the draft HELAA that could accommodate more growth in Battle and surrounding settlements?
- Representations made against Vision for Rye and the Eastern Settlements Cluster
- Representations made against 65. What are your views on the vision for Rye and the eastern network settlements?
- Representations made against 66. What are your views on the distribution and opportunities for growth in settlements within the sub-area in figures 25, 26 & 27?
- Representations made against 67. What are your views on the potential sites identified in the draft HELAA that could accommodate more growth in Rye and the eastern network settlements?
- Representations made against Vision for Northern Rother
- Representations made against 68. What are your views on the vision for Northern Rother?
- Representations made against 69. What are your views on the distribution and opportunities for growth in settlements within the sub-area in figures 29, 30 & 31?
- Representations made against 70. What are your views on the potential sites identified in the draft HELAA that could accommodate more growth in Northern Rother?
- Representations made against 71. What are your views on a potential 30-year vision for the A21 transport corridor?
- Representations made against 72. What are your views on the vision for Rother's countryside?
- Representations made against 73. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 74. What are your views on the proposed policy for Sites for Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople?
- Representations made against 75. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 76. What are your views on the district-wide development potential for the Local Plan up to 2040 which is presented in 4, 35 and 36?
- Representations made against 77. Do you agree with the principal identified by the Council of achieving a stepped housing delivery with greater levels of delivery planned for later in the plan period?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy DEV1: General Development Considerations
- Representations made against 78. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on general development considerations?
- Representations made against 79. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy DEV2: Comprehensive Development and Masterplanning
- Representations made against 80. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on comprehensive development and masterplanning?
- Representations made against 81. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy DEV3: Development Boundaries
- Representations made against 82. What are your views on the Council's approach to development boundaries?
- Representations made against 83. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy DEV4: Retention of Sites of Community or Economic Value
- Representations made against 84. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on the retention of sites of community and commercial value?
- Representations made against 85. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 86. What are your views on the range of uses that are covered by this policy?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy DEV5: Development on Small Sites and Windfall Development
- Representations made against 87. What are your views on the Council's strategy approaches to small sites and windfall development?
- Representations made against 88. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 89. What are your views on the Council, based on evidence, targeting a greater percentage of housing to come from smaller sites than the expected 10%?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy DEV6: Strategic Green Gaps
- Representations made against 90. What are your views on the Council's approach to strategic gaps and those that are identified?
- Representations made against 91. Are there any other areas of the district that the Council should be considering, and if so, what evidence is available?
- 6. Health and Wellbeing
-
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HWB1: Supporting Health and Wellbeing
- Representations made against 92. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on supporting health and wellbeing?
- Representations made against 93. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HWB2: Health Impact Assessments
- Representations made against 94. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on requiring a Health Impact Assessment for certain applications?
- Representations made against 95. Are there any other types of application, and/or different scales of development, the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 96. What are your views on the proposed policy for reducing harmful impacts on health?
- Representations made against 97. Is the Council considering the right types of commercial uses or should it be considering other uses?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HWB4: Community Facilities and Services
- Representations made against 98. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on community and social facilities and services?
- Representations made against 99. Are there any alternative or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 100. What are your views on the range of uses that are covered by this policy?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HWB5: Green and Blue Infrastructure
- Representations made against 101. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on green and blue infrastructure?
- Representations made against 102. Are there any alternative or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 103. Do you feel that this policy is sufficient to protect open space?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HWB6: Public Rights of Way
- Representations made against 104. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on public rights of way?
- Representations made against 105. Are there any alternative or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 106. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on the Combe Valley Countryside Park?
- Representations made against 107. Are there any alternative or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 108. What are your views on the Countryside Park being something the Council should continue to support?
- 7. Infrastructure
-
- Representations made against 7.1
- Representations made against 7.2
- Representations made against Proposed Policy INF1: Strategic Infrastructure Requirements
- Representations made against 109. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on strategic infrastructure requirements?
- Representations made against 110. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 111. Specifically, what are your views on requiring the submission of appropriate evidence to demonstrate that there is, or will be, sufficient infrastructure capacity to meet the demands of a new development?
- Representations made against 112. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on digital connectivity?
- Representations made against 113. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- 8 Housing
-
- Representations made against 8.1
- Representations made against 8.2
- Representations made against 8.3
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU1: Mixed and Balanced Communities
- Representations made against 114. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on mixed and balanced communities?
- Representations made against 115. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU2: Affordable Housing
- Representations made against 116. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on affordable housing?
- Representations made against 117. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 118. Do you consider that prioritising affordable housing or the Community Infrastructure Levy is more important for Rother?
- Representations made against 119. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on 100% affordable housing developments?
- Representations made against 120. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU4: Allocating Sites for Wholly or Substantially Affordable Housing
- Representations made against 121. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on allocating sites for wholly or substantially affordable housing?
- Representations made against 122. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU5: Rural Exception Sites
- Representations made against 123. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on rural exception sites?
- Representations made against 124. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU6: Sub-division of Dwellings, and Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMOs)
- Representations made against 125. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on the sub-division of dwellings, and Houses of Multiple Occupation?
- Representations made against 126. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 127. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on residential internal Space Standards?
- Representations made against 128. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 129. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on access standards?
- Representations made against 130. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU9: Specialist Housing for Older People
- Representations made against 131. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on specialist housing for older people?
- Representations made against 132. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 133. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on residential Care Homes for older people?
- Representations made against 134. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU11: Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople Criteria
- Representations made against 135. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople?
- Representations made against 136. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU12: Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding
- Representations made against 137. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding?
- Representations made against 138. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 139. Specifically, what are your views on the threshold for developments to provide serviced plots for self and custom housebuilders?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU13: New Dwellings in the Countryside
- Representations made against 140. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on new dwellings in the countryside?
- Representations made against 141. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 142. What are your views on the new criteria (vi) which would allow for single or pairs of small-scale dwellings as "in-fill" development outside development boundaries?
- Representations made against 143. What are your views on the proposal to limit the occupation of all new dwellings permitted under this policy (other than replacement dwellings) to that of a primary residence (and prevent use as a second home or holiday accommodation)?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU14: External Residential Areas
- Representations made against 144. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on external residential areas?
- Representations made against 145. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 146. What are your views on the requirements for private external space and do you feel they are appropriately flexible?
- Representations made against 147. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on extensions to residential gardens?
- Representations made against 148. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 149. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on extensions, alterations and outbuildings?
- Representations made against 150. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HOU17: Annexes
- Representations made against 151. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on annexes?
- Representations made against 152. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 153. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on boundary treatments?
- Representations made against 154. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 155. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on access and drives?
- Representations made against 156. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- 9 Economy
-
- Representations made against 9.1
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ECO1: Supporting New Employment Development
- Representations made against 157. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on supporting new employment development?
- Representations made against 158. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 159. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on protecting existing employment sites and premises?
- Representations made against 160. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 161. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on designated town centres?
- Representations made against 162. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ECO4: Retail and Leisure Impact Assessments
- Representations made against 164. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on retail and leisure impact assessments?
- Representations made against 165. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 166. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on tourism activities, facilities and accommodation.
- Representations made against 167. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ECO6: Holiday Sites
- Representations made against 168. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on holiday sites?
- Representations made against 169. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ECO7: Agriculture Development and Forestry
- Representations made against 170. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on agriculture and forestry activities?
- Representations made against 171. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ECO8: Agricultural Diversification
- Representations made against 172. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on diversification of agriculture?
- Representations made against 173. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 174. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on local employment and skills?
- Representations made against 175. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ECO10: Equestrian Developments
- Representations made against 176. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on equestrian developments?
- Representations made against 177. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- 10. Landscape Character
-
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LAN1: Rural Environments and Landscape Character
- Representations made against 178. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on rural environments and landscape character?
- Representations made against 179. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 180. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on trees, woodlands and hedgerows?
- Representations made against 181. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy LAN3: Dark Skies
- Representations made against 182. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on Dark Skies?
- Representations made against 183. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- 11. Environmental Management
-
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ENV1: Coastal, Water and Flood Risk Management
- Representations made against 184. What are your views on the proposed policy on water, coastal and flood risk management?
- Representations made against 185. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ENV2: Sustainable Surface Water Drainage
- Representations made against 186. What are your views on the proposed policy on sustainable drainage?
- Representations made against 187. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 188. What are your views on the proposed policy on land stability?
- Representations made against 189. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 190. Are there areas which you consider require an area specific policy, and if so, what evidence is available?
- Representations made against 191. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on the Fairlight Cove Coastal Change Management Area?
- Representations made against 192. Are there any further areas or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ENV5: Habitats and Species
- Representations made against 194. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on sites protected for their habitats and species?
- Representations made against 195. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 196. Specifically, what are your views on the Council requiring an impact assessment for any development proposed within 25 metres of Ancient Woodland?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ENV6: Sustainable Access and Recreation Management Strategy
- Representations made against 197. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on the Sustainable Access and Recreation Management Strategy?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy ENV7: Environmental Pollution
- Representations made against 199. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on environmental pollution?
- Representations made against 200. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against 201. Are there any other forms of pollution that the Council should be considering for a specific sub-point, and if so, what evidence is available?
- 12. Heritage
-
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HER1: Heritage Management
- Representations made against 202. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on heritage management?
- Representations made against 203. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HER2: Traditional Historic Farm Buildings
- Representations made against 204. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on traditional historic farm buildings?
- Representations made against 205. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
- Representations made against Proposed Policy HER3: Shopfronts, Signage and Advertising
- Representations made against 206. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on shopfronts, signage and advertising?
- Appendix 1: Strategic and Non-strategic Policies
-
- Representations made against Appendix 2: Town Centre designations
- Representations made against Appendix 4: Monitoring Framework
- Representations made against 208. What are your views on the proposed monitoring framework and indicators for each proposed planning policy?
- Representations made against 209. Are there any additional indicators that can be used to identify the effectiveness of each of the proposed planning policies?
- Glossary
- Local Plan Supporting Evidence Base Documents
- Representation search for Local Plan Supporting Evidence Base Documents
-
- Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA)
-
- Representations made against HELAA Part 1 - Report
- Representations made against HELAA Part 2 - Chapter 1, Bexhill
- Representations made against HELAA Part 2 - Chapter 2, Hastings Fringes
- Representations made against HELAA Part 2 - Chapter 3, Battle
- Representations made against HELAA Part 2 - Chapter 4, Rye
- Representations made against HELAA Part 2 - Chapter 5, Northern
- Sustainability Appraisal (SA)
- Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA)
- Schedule of Additional Modifications
- Representation search for Schedule of Additional Modifications
-
- Schedule of Additional Modifications
-
- Representations made against AM9
- Representations made against AM26
- Representations made against AM27
- Representations made against AM28
- Representations made against AM34
- Representations made against AM35
- Representations made against AM36
- Representations made against AM42
- Representations made against AM43
- Representations made against AM54
- Representations made against AM72
- Representations made against AM73
- Schedule of Main Modifications and changes to Policies Maps
- Representation search for Schedule of Main Modifications and changes to Policies Maps
- Proposed Submission Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan
- Representation search for Proposed Submission Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan
- Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
- Representation search for Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
- Draft Charging Schedule and Draft Regulation 123 List
- Representation search for Draft Charging Schedule and Draft Regulation 123 List
- Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and Regulation 123 List
- Representation search for Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and Regulation 123 List
- Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
- Representation search for Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
- Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
- Representation search for Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
-
- Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
- Table of Focused Amendments
-
- Representations made against FA1
- Representations made against FA2
- Representations made against FA3
- Representations made against FA4
- Representations made against FA6
- Representations made against FA6
- Representations made against FA7
- Representations made against FA8
- Representations made against FA9
- Representations made against FA10
- Representations made against FA11
- Representations made against FA12
- Representations made against FA13
- Representations made against FA14
- Representations made against FA16
- Representations made against FA17
- Representations made against FA18
- Representations made against FA19
- Representations made against FA20
- Representations made against FA22
- Representations made against FA23
- Proposed Submission Core Strategy
- Representation search for Proposed Submission Core Strategy
-
- Part 1 - Introduction and Context - 1. Introduction
- 2. Policy Context
- 3. 'Portrait of Rother District'
- 4. Main Issues
- Part II - Vision and Objectives - 5. Spatial Vision
- 6. Strategic Objectives
- Part III - Spatial Strategies - 7. Overall Spatial Strategy
- 8. Bexhill
- 9. Hastings Fringes
- 10. Rye and Rye Harbour
- 11. Battle
- 12. Rural Areas
- Part IV - Core Policies - 13. Sustainable Resource Management
- 14. Communities
- 15. Local Housing Needs
- 16. Economy
- 17. Environment
- 18. Transport and Accessibility
- 19. Implementation and Monitoring Framework
- Appendix 1: Local Plan Policies to be Superseded
- Appendix 2: Glossary of Terms
- Appendix 3: Components of Housing Supply
- Appendix 4: Key Design Principles
- Appendix 5: Monitoring Schedule
- Maps: District Key Diagram and Bexhill Inset Diagram
- Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
- Representation search for Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
-
- PART 1 - INTRODUCTION, CONTEXT AND VISION
- PART 2 - SPATIAL STRATEGY
- PART 3 - STRATEGY THEMES
-
- Representations made against 10. Communities
- Representations made against 11. Economy
- Representations made against 12. Environment
- Representations made against 13. Transport and Accessibility
- Representations made against 14. Implementation and Monitoring Framework
- Representations made against Map 1 - District Key Diagram
- Representations made against Map 2 - Bexhill and Hastings Fringes Inset Diagram
- Representations made against Comments on any other Core Strategy matter
- Sustainability Appraisal for Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions
- Representation search for Sustainability Appraisal for Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions
- Background Evidence Studies for Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions
- Representation search for Background Evidence Studies for Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions
- Rock Channel Rye Development Brief
- Representation search for Rock Channel Rye Development Brief
-
- Background
- Consultation Arrangements
- Vision
- Objectives
- Purpose of the Brief
- Policy Context
- Site Description
- Appraisal of the Area
- Development Principles
- Opportunity Areas
- Infrastructure and Contributions
- Implementation
- Monitoring
- Plan E - aerial photograph
- Appendix 1 - extract from the Rother District Local Plan
- Appendix 2 - relevant background documents
- North East Bexhill Masterplan
- Representation search for North East Bexhill Masterplan
- Core Strategy Issues & Options
- Representation search for Core Strategy Issues & Options
-
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Policy Context
- 3. Local Issues and Themes
- 4. Visions and Objectives
- 5. Theme 1:Balanced, Safe and Inclusive Communities
- 6. Theme 2: Prosperity for All
- 7. Theme 3: Communications and Accessibility
- 8. Theme 4: Quality in the Built and Natural Environment
- 9. Theme 5: Infrastructure and Community Facilities
- 10. Area Strategy Principles
- 11. How much development to plan for?
- 12. Development in existing settlement boundaries
- 13. Area Strategy (A) Bexhill and the fringes of Hastings
- 14. Area Strategy (B) Battle
- 15. Area Strategy (C) Rye
- 16. Area Strategy (D) Rural Areas
- 17. What happens next?
- Appendix 1 - List of Relevant Strategies and Plans
- Appendix 2 - Summary of 'Rother in Profile'