Question 9 re. general principles for guiding the location of development up to 2026

Showing comments and forms 1 to 24 of 24

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18511

Received: 30/11/2006

Respondent: HOWARD HUTTON & ASSOCIATES

Agent: HOWARD HUTTON & ASSOCIATES

Representation Summary:

general principles appropriate and accord with Government advice. Exceptions can be considered where wider community benefits can be provided as part of the development.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18521

Received: 06/12/2006

Respondent: Aroncorp Ltd

Agent: Broadlands

Representation Summary:

The general principles should recognise the role of Greenfield sites in securing a sufficient supply of residential development land to deliver the scale of affordable housing required in the Borough.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18539

Received: 07/12/2006

Respondent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

The protection of 'countryside gaps' is a planning policy that needs re-examination. In practice, some land that falls within designated 'strategic gaps' is actually less sensitive than land that falls outside such areas.

The general principle (xii) should be replaced with the following:
"Recognising the individual character and form of individual settlements and ensuring that this is not compromised".
The protection of strategic gaps might be one means of achieving this aim, but it allows for other townscape and landscape approaches to be followed.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18554

Received: 08/12/2006

Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit

Representation Summary:

The High Weald AONB is not a suitable location for large scale housing allocations. Large sites for housing should not therefore be located within the AONB. However there may be potential for a wide range of small scale, sustainably located development within the characteristic dispersed pattern of settlement that will meet local needs and be designed to promote the local character of the area.

Strongly support (x) regarding protection of ancient woodland from development.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18579

Received: 29/01/2007

Respondent: Crowhurst Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes, but they are in part confounded by the proposals to build the link road, the Queensway office development and the suggestion that 800 homes and a station be built at Upper Wilting. These proposals beg the question that only lip service is being paid to the principles of (ix) "respecting the importance of the countryside" or (xii) "protecting vulnerable countryside gaps between settlements

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18591

Received: 30/01/2007

Respondent: Beckley Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Beckley Parish Councillors see the protection of the High Weald AONB as of paramount importance. Councillors fully support the High Weald 20 year Management Plan to preserve and support the unique qualities of villages like Beckley as dispersed settlements based on non-agricultural rural industries.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18616

Received: 31/01/2007

Respondent: Ewhurst Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18632

Received: 31/01/2007

Respondent: Rye Conservation Society

Representation Summary:

The natural environment and the built environment are underplayed in Section 10. The Local Plan principles (i) to (xiv) should be included in the LDF with SSSIs added to principle (vi). There is no reference to historic towns and conservation areas; there should be specific inclusion of best practice conservation area management principles in the LDF.
The need for measures to address environmental issues such as water and energy conservation and waste recycling are not adequately featured in the strategy principles, though their importance at the national level is acknowledged by citing PPS1 on page 19.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18658

Received: 01/02/2007

Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd

Agent: Charles Planning Associates Limited

Representation Summary:

It is considered that the general principles of the Local Plan provide a comprehensive basis upon which to determine the location of development. However, it is considered that the principles could be summarised and reduced, as it is not considered that every development will be able to fully accord with each principle and as such the Core Strategy should provide a more flexible approach. It is inevitable that change will occur in those twenty years, which may render some of the guiding principles redundant, it is therefore considered more appropriate to identify key principles which provide an element of fiexibility.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18690

Received: 02/02/2007

Respondent: Mr. A. Miskin

Agent: DMH Stallard

Representation Summary:

Principle (i) - although brownfield land development has priority, some development of greenfield land may be needed. There needs to be specific mention of this to ensure it is the best connected land with the lowest ecological value (therefore most sustainable).

(iv) â€" development in locations with good accessibility by public transport should be supported.

(xii) â€" there is a current need to continually supply housing land and the targets should be fully recognised in the LDF.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18702

Received: 05/02/2007

Respondent: Mr. and Mrs. Appleby

Agent: Terence O'Rourke

Representation Summary:

The Strategy should prioritise the use of previously developed land (PDL), include local PDL targets/trajectories and incorporate strategies for bringing PDL into housing use (see PPS3).

The Strategy should ensure a flexible/responsive housing land supply. It should include policies and implementation strategies to ensure sufficient, suitable land to achieve housing and PDL delivery objectives.

The approach should reflect PPS3, paragraph 53. Short term sites should be deliverable and developable.

Greater emphasis should be given to the sequential approach to identifying sites than the Local Plan. In the absence of suitable urban sites, PDL adjacent to existing settlements should be allocated.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18723

Received: 08/02/2007

Respondent: English Village Projects

Agent: Evison & Company

Representation Summary:

Due to limited resources for survey work, national, regional and county policies cannot be based upon an intimate knowledge of the functioning of an individual District. Such policies must be interpreted and applied at a District level in a manner that does not frustrate the legitimate aims of the District. With the provision of housing in villages and market towns it is important to recognise that some additional housing may be a legitimate means of enabling not only the meeting of local needs for housing and local services, but also the improvement of the environmental quality of the village.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18737

Received: 08/02/2007

Respondent: Highways Agency

Representation Summary:

The HA is in favour of achieving accessibility through a greater choice of safe and convenient transport methods rather than private car based travel alone. The HA is therefore suggesting that, in order to fully comply with PPS12 Test of Soundness 4 and 7, local level land-use development strategies take the opportunity to reduce the need to travel and reliance on the private car, and encourage travel by sustainable modes.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18757

Received: 09/02/2007

Respondent: PREM (Rooster) Limited

Agent: Montagu Evans

Representation Summary:

Support is given in particular to the principles of making the best use of land through the re-use of previously developed land and buildings and that a sufficient supply of housing land is made available. This is particularly important in the District given the delays in the construction of the Bexhill Hastings Link Road.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18781

Received: 09/02/2007

Respondent: Home Builders Federation

Representation Summary:

To enable a better balance of development objectives, the following should be included:
¨ To enable the delivery of a wide choice of high quality housing development, which seeks to take account of both need and market demand.
¨ To allow the timely delivery of housing development which is in step with the sub-regional housing market.
¨ To provide a flexible and responsive supply of available land with site allocations preferably over the whole period of the Plan, to provide certainty for house builders. This is now a requirement of PPS3.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18815

Received: 13/02/2007

Respondent: AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes)

Representation Summary:

Specifically we think that something needs to be added to the general principles in respect of affordable housing. For example 'Using housing needs statistics to identify and substantiate the need for affordable housing across the district and particularly in rural settlements and small villages' .

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18849

Received: 14/02/2007

Respondent: Land Securities plc

Agent: CGMS Ltd

Representation Summary:

We support the broad principles for the location of development, particularly the priority to make best use of urban land, especially through the re-use of previously developed land / buildings.

With regard to retail, we recognise that the size and location of existing units do not provide for an attractive shopping environment for customers and occupiers. Therefore, alternative locations are required, and existing out of centre locations should be considered appropriate for further retailing, such as Ravenside Retail Park.

Community and recreation facilities in out of town location may not be the most appropriate location as modernisation and expansion in existing locations would not be possible.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18875

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Forestry Commission

Representation Summary:

Since the Local Plan was adopted PPS9 has strengthened its protection of ancient woodland. It states that "They should not grant planning permission for any development that would result in its loss or deterioration unless the need for, and benefits of, the development in that location outweigh the loss of woodland habitat" Policy NRM5 of the South East Plan currently reads "Protecting ancient woodland from damaging development and land uses" We suggest that the principle in this Local Development Framework is strengthened to 'ensuring no development in ancient woodlands'. Ensuring the protection of ancient woodland to the same standard as SSSls would help with this.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18884

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Strutt & Parker

Representation Summary:

We have reviewed the 14 criteria derived from the current Local Plan as broad principles guiding the location of new development.

We consider that an additional principle should be added, in recognition of the importance of the rural sector in Rother, committing the Council to support the proposals to achieve a healthy, diverse and prosperous rural economy whilst protecting the best and the unique features which characterise the rural environment in Rother.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18894

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Persimmon Homes South East

Agent: Bell Cornwell

Representation Summary:

We broadly support the principles set out in paragraph 4.1 on page 26 insofar as it follows the principles set out in Local Plan Policies DS1 and DS2. In this context we note that sub-paragraph (iv) of policy DS2 provides for limited growth of selected villages that contain a range of services. Northiam falls within that category. This principle should be at the top of any list as a priority, and other principles made subservient to that objective. PPS3 has now replaced PPG 3 and places different emphasis on the criteria to be used in identifying suitable location for new housing. Northiam falls within this criterion and should be considered for new housing growth.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18911

Received: 16/02/2007

Respondent: Councillor David Vereker

Representation Summary:

There is leeway for discussion, but in general our Planning strategy is pretty sound.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18936

Received: 19/02/2007

Respondent: Rother Voluntary Action

Representation Summary:

There are 14 of them! Are these the most appropriate? Sounds like Grouch Marx. "If you don't like these I have others". Nothing here to disagree with but what is the difference between a Theme and a Principle? Looks like a degree of overlap.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 18958

Received: 22/02/2007

Respondent: National Farmers' Union (South East Region)

Representation Summary:

When forming coastal policy, adequate importance must be given to protecting agricultural land. Concerned that funding pressures will result in coastal management concentrating on working with natural processes without adequately protecting the economic and social values of the coastal zone.

Agricultural land must not be considered sacrificial â€" it has an economic value and is the principal capital asset of many farm businesses. The strategic significance of this land in providing food and renewable energy crops now and for the future generations should not be underestimated. Agricultural land when flooded by seawater is not easily restored to a productive state.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Representation ID: 19006

Received: 26/02/2007

Respondent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

We support the broad policy statements set out in 4.1 (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi).