3. Vision for the Future

Support

Representation ID: 19238

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Park Holidays UK

Agent: Rural Solutions

The Sussex Coast Sub-Region should be identified as a distinct area which cross cuts rural and urban areas within the vision statement (Box 1)

Support

Representation ID: 19376

Received: 17/02/2009

Respondent: Natural England

Limiting growth in rural villages to those with a range of services (Box 3, pg.29) will help to prevent urban sprawl and protect the character of the countryside and of rural communities.

Support

Representation ID: 19377

Received: 17/02/2009

Respondent: Natural England

Natural England commends Rother District's explicit recognition of the 'ecological, agricultural, public enjoyment and intrinsic value of the countryside' (Box 3(i), pg.20

Object

Representation ID: 19384

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Rother Environmental Group

Ensure that development contributes to the community's resilience to the impacts of climate change and the addresses their need for security of supply of food, energy and water.

Comment

Representation ID: 19599

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE

Rother should challenge the continued imposition of such top-down targets and take up powers under the Sustainable Communities Act.
Emphasise the provision of public transport to improve connectivity.

Comment

Representation ID: 19820

Received: 04/02/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Society

How compatible is the vision with:
- Development of road infrastructures
- Building of houses and business units

Should it be recognised that even by 2030 it is very unlikely that local employment demand will be met by local business.
3.2 Needs to figure in everything.
3.6 There will be a finite solution