Map 1 - District Key Diagram

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19556

Received: 25/02/2009

Respondent: Trustees of the Glyndebourne 1991 L & P Trust

Agent: Mr. Dale Mayhew

Representation Summary:

PPS7 makes clear that within rural areas, Planning Authorities should focus most new
development in or near to Local Service Centres and that these should be identified in
Development Plan Documents as the preferred location for development.
The Rother District Council Rural Settlements Study identifies Robertsbridge as a Rural Service
Centre, having regard to its extensive services and level of accessibility by non-car modes of
transport.
Having regard to both these factors, strong support is given to the Council's identification of the
settlement of Robertsbridge as benefiting from "development potential" as identified on the
District Key Diagram to accompany the Core Strategy Document.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19885

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Mr. Alan Bolden

Representation Summary:

In respect of 'Special Areas of Conservation, what is special about Winchelsea Beach and Jurys Gap om Map 1?

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19888

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Mr. Alan Bolden

Representation Summary:

Map 1

Why in this area do you show one of your Strategic Countryside Gaps?

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 20104

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: TOM SACKVILLE

Agent: Batcheller Thacker

Representation Summary:

Key diagram: Reference should be made to the scope for development to the west of Bexhill.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 20119

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Highways Agency

Representation Summary:

The Highways Agency scheme on the A21 - Flimwell to Robertsbridge has a Preferred Route and Route Protection. Therefore considered that this scheme should be included inthe Key Diagram.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 20209

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Block

Agent: Batcheller Thacker

Representation Summary:

Key diagram: To the omission of an inset diagram for Battle.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 20504

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Block

Agent: Batcheller Thacker

Representation Summary:

Object to the omission of an inset map for Battle.