Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 37: Which of the development options for Northeye do you prefer? Should other options be considered?
Representation ID: 23625
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
Preferred Site: Northeye (Former United Arab Emirates - Technical Training Project), Bexhill (Ref: BX101)
Much of the site is likely to be heavily disturbed, but there are some areas of potential survival of archaeological remains, including some potential for waterlogged remains.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
Preferred Site: Northeye (Former United Arab Emirates - Technical Training Project), Bexhill (Ref: BX101)
Much of the site is likely to be heavily disturbed, but there are some areas of potential survival of archaeological remains, including some potential for waterlogged remains.
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 38: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX11? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23626
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX11: Land at Sidley Sports and Social Club, Bexhill
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX11: Land at Sidley Sports and Social Club, Bexhill
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 39: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX12, including the proposed town centre boundary as defined in Figure 46? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23627
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
Policy BEX12: Bexhill Town Centre
The area was developed in the late 19th century and contains a number of listed buildings and a conservation area, which would need to be considered in development proposals.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
Policy BEX12: Bexhill Town Centre
The area was developed in the late 19th century and contains a number of listed buildings and a conservation area, which would need to be considered in development proposals.
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 41: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX14, including the proposed cultural area boundary as defined in Figure 46? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23628
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX14: Bexhill Cultural Area
We are supportive of the policy and would like to see Bexhill Museum enhanced to absorb the archaeological finds being generated by the significant level of development around the town.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX14: Bexhill Cultural Area
We are supportive of the policy and would like to see Bexhill Museum enhanced to absorb the archaeological finds being generated by the significant level of development around the town.
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 43: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX15? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23629
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX15: Land south-east of Beeching Road
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX15: Land south-east of Beeching Road
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 44: Do you agree that London Road - Sackville Road, Bexhill should be targeted for enhancements and, if so, what should be the priorities?
Representation ID: 23630
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
-London Road -Sackville Road Enhancement Area
We agree that as a "gateway" area this location would benefit from enhancement, including designation of the Edwardian terraces. The Drill Hall should be retained in its current location to form part of the architectural enhancement of this area.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
-London Road -Sackville Road Enhancement Area
We agree that as a "gateway" area this location would benefit from enhancement, including designation of the Edwardian terraces. The Drill Hall should be retained in its current location to form part of the architectural enhancement of this area.
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 46: Do you agree with the recommendation regarding the Bexhill development boundary? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this area?
Representation ID: 23631
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
Development boundary
Any additional development areas have a high archaeological potential and should be subject to archaeological assessment to clarify risk
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
Development boundary
Any additional development areas have a high archaeological potential and should be subject to archaeological assessment to clarify risk
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 47: Do you agree with the preferred site for housing development along the Hastings Fringes? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 23632
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
Yes, although HAS3 will require assessment to clarify risk
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
Yes, although HAS3 will require assessment to clarify risk
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 48: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23633
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS1: Land at Michael Tyler Furniture, Woodlands Way, Hastings
The site is heavily disturbed and of no archaeological interest
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS1: Land at Michael Tyler Furniture, Woodlands Way, Hastings
The site is heavily disturbed and of no archaeological interest
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 50: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23634
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS2: Land east of Burgess Road, Hastings
The site has a low archaeological potential due to topography and disturbance by former quarries.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS2: Land east of Burgess Road, Hastings
The site has a low archaeological potential due to topography and disturbance by former quarries.
-GREEN