Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 92: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy WES4? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23603
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Landscape
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS
Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.
Landscape
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS
Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 93: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23604
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Landscape
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS
Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.
Landscape
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS
Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 3: Where, if anywhere, do you think could be an appropriate location for wind turbine(s) to be sited in the District?
Representation ID: 23606
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Potential sites should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to allocation
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Potential sites should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to allocation
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 13: Do you agree with the proposed policy approach to extensions to residential gardens and the proposed policy wording? If not, what changes would you wish to see?
Representation ID: 23607
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HOUSING
It should be highlighted that NPPF heritage policy may require planning conditions relating to archaeological conditions. -GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HOUSING
It should be highlighted that NPPF heritage policy may require planning conditions relating to archaeological conditions. -GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 18: Do you agree with the policy approaches to maintaining landscape character and the High Weald AONB and to the respective proposed policy wordings?
Representation ID: 23608
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
ENVIRONMENT Page 79
-Landscape character and High Weald AONB
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
ENVIRONMENT Page 79
-Landscape character and High Weald AONB
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 19: Do you agree with the proposed definition of the Strategic Gaps, and the policy applying to them? If not, what changes would you wish to see?
Representation ID: 23609
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
ENVIRONMENT
-Strategic gaps
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
ENVIRONMENT
-Strategic gaps
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 20: Do you agree with the policy approach to supporting biodiversity and green space and to the proposed policy wording?
Representation ID: 23610
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
ENVIRONMENT
-Biodiversity and green space
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
ENVIRONMENT
-Biodiversity and green space
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 22: Do you agree with the policy approach to land stability and the proposed policy wording?
Representation ID: 23611
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
ENVIRONMENT
-Land stability
It should be highlighted that the Fairlight coastal zone buffer and Pett Level catchment both contain archaeological sites that need to be considered.
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
ENVIRONMENT
-Land stability
It should be highlighted that the Fairlight coastal zone buffer and Pett Level catchment both contain archaeological sites that need to be considered.
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 24: Do you agree with the policy approach to comprehensive development and the proposed policy wording?
Representation ID: 23612
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
IMPLEMENTATION Page 115
-Comprehensive development
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
IMPLEMENTATION Page 115
-Comprehensive development
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 26: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23613
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX1: Land at Levetts Wood and Oaktree Farm, Sidley
The site has high potential for prehistoric and Roman archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated -AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX1: Land at Levetts Wood and Oaktree Farm, Sidley
The site has high potential for prehistoric and Roman archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated -AMBER