Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 92: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy WES4? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23603

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 93: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23604

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 3: Where, if anywhere, do you think could be an appropriate location for wind turbine(s) to be sited in the District?

Representation ID: 23606

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Potential sites should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to allocation
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 13: Do you agree with the proposed policy approach to extensions to residential gardens and the proposed policy wording? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 23607

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

HOUSING

It should be highlighted that NPPF heritage policy may require planning conditions relating to archaeological conditions. -GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 18: Do you agree with the policy approaches to maintaining landscape character and the High Weald AONB and to the respective proposed policy wordings?

Representation ID: 23608

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT Page 79
-Landscape character and High Weald AONB

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 19: Do you agree with the proposed definition of the Strategic Gaps, and the policy applying to them? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 23609

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT
-Strategic gaps

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 20: Do you agree with the policy approach to supporting biodiversity and green space and to the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 23610

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT

-Biodiversity and green space

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 22: Do you agree with the policy approach to land stability and the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 23611

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT

-Land stability

It should be highlighted that the Fairlight coastal zone buffer and Pett Level catchment both contain archaeological sites that need to be considered.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 24: Do you agree with the policy approach to comprehensive development and the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 23612

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

IMPLEMENTATION Page 115
-Comprehensive development

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 26: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23613

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX1: Land at Levetts Wood and Oaktree Farm, Sidley

The site has high potential for prehistoric and Roman archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated -AMBER

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.