Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 92: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy WES4? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23603

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Full text:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 93: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23604

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Full text:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 3: Where, if anywhere, do you think could be an appropriate location for wind turbine(s) to be sited in the District?

Representation ID: 23606

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Potential sites should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to allocation
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Potential sites should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to allocation
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 13: Do you agree with the proposed policy approach to extensions to residential gardens and the proposed policy wording? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 23607

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

HOUSING

It should be highlighted that NPPF heritage policy may require planning conditions relating to archaeological conditions. -GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

HOUSING

It should be highlighted that NPPF heritage policy may require planning conditions relating to archaeological conditions. -GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 18: Do you agree with the policy approaches to maintaining landscape character and the High Weald AONB and to the respective proposed policy wordings?

Representation ID: 23608

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT Page 79
-Landscape character and High Weald AONB

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

ENVIRONMENT Page 79
-Landscape character and High Weald AONB

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 19: Do you agree with the proposed definition of the Strategic Gaps, and the policy applying to them? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 23609

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT
-Strategic gaps

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

ENVIRONMENT
-Strategic gaps

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 20: Do you agree with the policy approach to supporting biodiversity and green space and to the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 23610

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT

-Biodiversity and green space

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

ENVIRONMENT

-Biodiversity and green space

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 22: Do you agree with the policy approach to land stability and the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 23611

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

ENVIRONMENT

-Land stability

It should be highlighted that the Fairlight coastal zone buffer and Pett Level catchment both contain archaeological sites that need to be considered.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

ENVIRONMENT

-Land stability

It should be highlighted that the Fairlight coastal zone buffer and Pett Level catchment both contain archaeological sites that need to be considered.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 24: Do you agree with the policy approach to comprehensive development and the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 23612

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

IMPLEMENTATION Page 115
-Comprehensive development

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

IMPLEMENTATION Page 115
-Comprehensive development

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 26: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23613

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology
BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX1: Land at Levetts Wood and Oaktree Farm, Sidley

The site has high potential for prehistoric and Roman archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated -AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX1: Land at Levetts Wood and Oaktree Farm, Sidley

The site has high potential for prehistoric and Roman archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated -AMBER

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.