Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New search
New search
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 61: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BRO2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains, adjacent site to the west contained medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains, adjacent site to the west contained medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 62: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Yes
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Yes
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 63: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Camber? If not, which sites should be preferred?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Yes
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Yes
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 64: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy CAM1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
This is a site of 19th century school of local archaeological interest. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
This is a site of 19th century school of local archaeological interest. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 65: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy CAM2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
The site contains WW2 defence remains of local archaeological interest. Any visible extant remains would need to be preserved. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
The site contains WW2 defence remains of local archaeological interest. Any visible extant remains would need to be preserved. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 66: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Yes
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Yes
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 67: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Catsfield? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
Both sites will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk
-AMBER
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
Both sites will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk
-AMBER
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 68: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy CAT1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
-AMBER
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
-AMBER
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 69: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy CAT2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
-AMBER
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
-AMBER
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 70: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
Both sites will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
-AMBER
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
Both sites will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
-AMBER
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.