Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23631

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

Development boundary

Any additional development areas have a high archaeological potential and should be subject to archaeological assessment to clarify risk
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

Development boundary

Any additional development areas have a high archaeological potential and should be subject to archaeological assessment to clarify risk
-AMBER