Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 51: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS3? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23635
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS3: Land north of A265, Ivyhouse Lane, Hastings
The site has a medium / high potential to contain archaeological remains from all periods and should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS3: Land north of A265, Ivyhouse Lane, Hastings
The site has a medium / high potential to contain archaeological remains from all periods and should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 52: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS4? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23636
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS4: Rock Lane Urban Fringe Management Area
Agree
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS4: Rock Lane Urban Fringe Management Area
Agree
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 53: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS5, including the boundary as defined in the Policies Map? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23637
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS5: Combe Valley Countryside Park
It should be noted that the Countryside Park contains a significant amount of archaeological sites, which would need to be included in conservation and management plans.
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Policy HAS5: Combe Valley Countryside Park
It should be noted that the Countryside Park contains a significant amount of archaeological sites, which would need to be included in conservation and management plans.
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 54: Do you agree with the recommendation regarding the Hastings Fringes development boundaries? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundaries to be applied to this area?
Representation ID: 23638
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Development boundary
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
HASTINGS FRINGES page 197
-Development boundary
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 55: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Beckley Four Oaks? If not, which sites should be preferred?
Representation ID: 23639
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Beckley Four Oaks
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Beckley Four Oaks
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 56: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEC1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23640
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
The site has a low / medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. There are some areas of disturbance, but a planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with para 128 of the NPPF.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
The site has a low / medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. There are some areas of disturbance, but a planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with para 128 of the NPPF.
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 57: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEC2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23641
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
The site has a low / medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
The site has a low / medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 58: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23642
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 59: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Broad Oak? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 23643
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 60: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BRO1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23644
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN