Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 51: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS3? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23635

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

HASTINGS FRINGES page 197

-Policy HAS3: Land north of A265, Ivyhouse Lane, Hastings

The site has a medium / high potential to contain archaeological remains from all periods and should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 52: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS4? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23636

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

HASTINGS FRINGES page 197

-Policy HAS4: Rock Lane Urban Fringe Management Area

Agree

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 53: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HAS5, including the boundary as defined in the Policies Map? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23637

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

HASTINGS FRINGES page 197

-Policy HAS5: Combe Valley Countryside Park

It should be noted that the Countryside Park contains a significant amount of archaeological sites, which would need to be included in conservation and management plans.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 54: Do you agree with the recommendation regarding the Hastings Fringes development boundaries? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundaries to be applied to this area?

Representation ID: 23638

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

HASTINGS FRINGES page 197

-Development boundary

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 55: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Beckley Four Oaks? If not, which sites should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23639

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Beckley Four Oaks

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 56: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEC1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23640

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

The site has a low / medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. There are some areas of disturbance, but a planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with para 128 of the NPPF.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 57: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEC2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23641

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

The site has a low / medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 58: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23642

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 59: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Broad Oak? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23643

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Broad Oak

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 60: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BRO1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23644

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Broad Oak

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.