Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 27: Do you agree with the preferred sites for housing development at Bexhill? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23614

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Site options for housing

We have assessed most sites as either low or medium risk, with those at medium requiring archaeological assessment. Only BEX4 is of concern due to the site containing a non-designated heritage asset that would be vulnerable to impact / demolition.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Site options for housing

We have assessed most sites as either low or medium risk, with those at medium requiring archaeological assessment. Only BEX4 is of concern due to the site containing a non-designated heritage asset that would be vulnerable to impact / demolition.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 28: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23615

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX2: Land at Preston Hall Farm, Sidley

The site has been subject to archaeological assessment, including geophysical survey. This has identified remains of local archaeological interest.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX2: Land at Preston Hall Farm, Sidley

The site has been subject to archaeological assessment, including geophysical survey. This has identified remains of local archaeological interest.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 29: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX3? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23616

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX3: Land at North Bexhill

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128


-Policy BEX3: Land at North Bexhill

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 30: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX4? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23618

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX4: Land at Former High School Site and Drill Hall, Down Road, Bexhill

The site contains an extant early 20th century drill hall associated with the Royal Sussex Battalions that fought in WW1. The site is therefore of very high local archaeological and historic significance and should not be demolished.
-RED

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX4: Land at Former High School Site and Drill Hall, Down Road, Bexhill

The site contains an extant early 20th century drill hall associated with the Royal Sussex Battalions that fought in WW1. The site is therefore of very high local archaeological and historic significance and should not be demolished.
-RED

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 31: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX5? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23619

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX5: Land at Gullivers Bowls Club, Knole Road, Bexhill

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, and Roman remains. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX5: Land at Gullivers Bowls Club, Knole Road, Bexhill

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, and Roman remains. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 32: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX6? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23620

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX6: Land adjacent to Cemetery Lodge /276 Turkey Road, Bexhill

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX6: Land adjacent to Cemetery Lodge /276 Turkey Road, Bexhill

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 33: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX7? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23621

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX7: Land at Moleynes Mead, Fryatts Way, Bexhill

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains, but areas are likely to be disturbed. The current house on site appears to have been constructed in the 1920s and may be of some architectural merit. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX7: Land at Moleynes Mead, Fryatts Way, Bexhill

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains, but areas are likely to be disturbed. The current house on site appears to have been constructed in the 1920s and may be of some architectural merit. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 34: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX8? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23622

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX8: Land south of Terminus Road

The site has a low potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains, but historic maps record former buildings, possible relating to the former railway. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX8: Land south of Terminus Road

The site has a low potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains, but historic maps record former buildings, possible relating to the former railway. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 35: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX9? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23623

Received: 27/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX9 Land off Spindlewood Drive, Bexhill

The site has high potential for prehistoric and Roman archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX9 Land off Spindlewood Drive, Bexhill

The site has high potential for prehistoric and Roman archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 36: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX10? If

Representation ID: 23624

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX10: Land at Barnhorn Green, Bexhill

The site has been subject to archaeological evaluation, which has identified late Iron Age and Roman settlement remains. The site has already been granted planning permission with an archaeological planning condition
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

BEXHILL Page 128

-Policy BEX10: Land at Barnhorn Green, Bexhill

The site has been subject to archaeological evaluation, which has identified late Iron Age and Roman settlement remains. The site has already been granted planning permission with an archaeological planning condition
-GREEN

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.