Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 102: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Winchelsea in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to

Representation ID: 23943

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Flood Risk Management

Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317

We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.

Full text:

Flood Risk Management

Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317

We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 103: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Winchelsea Beach? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement

Representation ID: 23944

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Flood Risk Management

Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317

We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.

Full text:

Flood Risk Management

Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317

We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 91: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy WES3? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23945

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman (including a major Roman road) and medieval archaeological remains relating to the historic core of Westfield Moor, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman (including a major Roman road) and medieval archaeological remains relating to the historic core of Westfield Moor, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 72: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23946

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

Hurst Green

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

Hurst Green

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 73: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23947

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

Hurst Green

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

Hurst Green

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 74: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23948

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

Hurst Green

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

Hurst Green

Yes

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.