Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 102: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Winchelsea in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to
Representation ID: 23943
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Flood Risk Management
Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317
We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.
Flood Risk Management
Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317
We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 103: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Winchelsea Beach? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement
Representation ID: 23944
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Flood Risk Management
Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317
We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.
Flood Risk Management
Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317
We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 91: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy WES3? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23945
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Westfield
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman (including a major Roman road) and medieval archaeological remains relating to the historic core of Westfield Moor, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Westfield
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman (including a major Roman road) and medieval archaeological remains relating to the historic core of Westfield Moor, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 72: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23946
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
Hurst Green
Yes
Ecology
Hurst Green
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 73: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23947
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
Hurst Green
Yes
Ecology
Hurst Green
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 74: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23948
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
Hurst Green
Yes
Ecology
Hurst Green
Yes
