Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 71: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Hurst Green? If not, which sites should be preferred?
Representation ID: 23655
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 72: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23656
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
Given the sites steep topography, it is likely to have a low / medium archaeological potential for containing archaeological remains. Historic field boundaries should be considered during the layout design. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
Given the sites steep topography, it is likely to have a low / medium archaeological potential for containing archaeological remains. Historic field boundaries should be considered during the layout design. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 73: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23657
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
The site contains either an extant or site of a post-medieval house. If extant then consideration regarding the retention of a non-designated heritage asset would be required. The remainder of the site is likely to have been heavily disturbed by the construction of the yard surface.
-GREEN
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
The site contains either an extant or site of a post-medieval house. If extant then consideration regarding the retention of a non-designated heritage asset would be required. The remainder of the site is likely to have been heavily disturbed by the construction of the yard surface.
-GREEN
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 74: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23658
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Hurst Green
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 75: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Iden? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 23659
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Iden
The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
-AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Iden
The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
-AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 76: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy IDE1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23660
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Iden
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Iden
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 77: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23661
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Iden
The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk -the boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Iden
The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk -the boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 78: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Northiam? If not, which site should be preferred?
Representation ID: 23662
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Northiam
The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Northiam
The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 79: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy NOR1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23663
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Northiam
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated. Visual impact to designated parkland would also need consideration.
AMBER
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Northiam
The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated. Visual impact to designated parkland would also need consideration.
AMBER
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 80: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23664
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Northiam
The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Northiam
The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER