Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 71: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Hurst Green? If not, which sites should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23655

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 72: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23656

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

Given the sites steep topography, it is likely to have a low / medium archaeological potential for containing archaeological remains. Historic field boundaries should be considered during the layout design. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

Given the sites steep topography, it is likely to have a low / medium archaeological potential for containing archaeological remains. Historic field boundaries should be considered during the layout design. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 73: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy HUR2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23657

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

The site contains either an extant or site of a post-medieval house. If extant then consideration regarding the retention of a non-designated heritage asset would be required. The remainder of the site is likely to have been heavily disturbed by the construction of the yard surface.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

The site contains either an extant or site of a post-medieval house. If extant then consideration regarding the retention of a non-designated heritage asset would be required. The remainder of the site is likely to have been heavily disturbed by the construction of the yard surface.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 74: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23658

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Hurst Green

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 75: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Iden? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23659

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Iden

The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Iden

The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 76: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy IDE1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23660

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Iden

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Iden

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated
AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 77: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23661

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Iden

The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk -the boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Iden

The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk -the boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 78: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Northiam? If not, which site should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23662

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Northiam

The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Northiam

The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 79: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy NOR1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23663

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Northiam

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated. Visual impact to designated parkland would also need consideration.
AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Northiam

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated. Visual impact to designated parkland would also need consideration.
AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 80: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23664

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Northiam

The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Northiam

The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
AMBER

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.