Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 81: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Peasmarsh? If not, which site should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23665

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Peasmarsh

The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Peasmarsh

The site will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 82: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy PEA1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23666

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Peasmarsh

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Peasmarsh

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 83: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23667

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Peasmarsh

The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Peasmarsh

The site will require archaeological assessment to clarify risk, boundary could then be modified to exclude significant archaeological remains.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 84: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Rye Harbour? If not, which site should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23668

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 85: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy RHA1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23669

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

The site contains industrial archaeology remains relating to railways and gravel extraction. Consideration would be required regarding any extant historic buildings on site.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

The site contains industrial archaeology remains relating to railways and gravel extraction. Consideration would be required regarding any extant historic buildings on site.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 86: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23670

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 87: Do you agree with Policy RHA2 regarding the Harbour Road Industrial Estate and the proposed boundary changes? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23671

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

Yes, although it is important to remember this is an industrial settlement.
GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Rye Harbour

Yes, although it is important to remember this is an industrial settlement.
GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 88: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Westfield? If not, which site should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23672

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

Some of the sites will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

Some of the sites will require archaeological assessment, prior to being allocated, to clarify risk
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 89: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy WES1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23673

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

The site has high potential for prehistoric, Roman and medieval archaeological remains, so should be subject to archaeological assessment before being allocated.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 90: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy WES2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23674

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

This is the site of a late 19th century mansion with the medium potential for remains from earlier periods. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Westfield

This is the site of a late 19th century mansion with the medium potential for remains from earlier periods. Any planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with section 128 of the NPPF
-GREEN

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.