Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 102: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Winchelsea in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to

Representation ID: 23685

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes this retains growth within the post-medieval core and does not impact the abandoned medieval sections of the town. However consideration should be given to the very high potential for archaeological remains, including medieval cellars, as well as the large number of extant historic buildings.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes this retains growth within the post-medieval core and does not impact the abandoned medieval sections of the town. However consideration should be given to the very high potential for archaeological remains, including medieval cellars, as well as the large number of extant historic buildings.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 103: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Winchelsea Beach? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement

Representation ID: 23686

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Winchelsea Beach

The Smeatons Harbour section of this area has a high archaeological potential.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Winchelsea Beach

The Smeatons Harbour section of this area has a high archaeological potential.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 104: Do you agree with the preferred sites for permanent Gypsy and Traveller pitches across the District? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23687

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Gypsies and Travellers

The sites would need to be assessed in relation to archaeological potential and areas of significant remains scoped out.
-AMBER

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Gypsies and Travellers

The sites would need to be assessed in relation to archaeological potential and areas of significant remains scoped out.
-AMBER

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 105: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy GYP1, including the boundary as defined on the Policies Map? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23688

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Gypsies and Travellers

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Gypsies and Travellers

The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 108: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy GUE1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23689

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot

The site is heavily disturbed and of no archaeological interest

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot

The site is heavily disturbed and of no archaeological interest

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 109: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy (MAR1)? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23690

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Marley Lane

The site already carried an archaeological planning condition RR/3165/CC, so future applications would be expected to be consistent - GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Marley Lane

The site already carried an archaeological planning condition RR/3165/CC, so future applications would be expected to be consistent - GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 110: Do you agree with a policy to support the continued allocation for the re-instatement of the railway link from Robertsbridge to Bodiam along its original route?

Representation ID: 23691

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Rother Valley Railway

Yes, although consideration must be given to archaeological costs in recording the industrial / railway archaeology - GREEN

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Rother Valley Railway

Yes, although consideration must be given to archaeological costs in recording the industrial / railway archaeology - GREEN

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 107: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Guestling Green? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23692

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 111: Do you have any comments on this scope or content of the new Local Plan that are not covered by other questions?

Representation ID: 23693

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

The Local Plan is rather lacking in relation to Heritage and Archaeology. It will be important that sites we have highlighted as amber and red risk are fully assessed.

The recommendations about archaeological interest and risk in the RAG assessment which have been submitted by ESCC Archaeology Section to Rother DC in January 2017 for each of the site allocations should appear in the texts for each of the site allocation documents in Part 2 of the Local Plan (DaSA). In that way an early understanding of the key issues will be available to those using the plan documents.

Full text:

Archaeology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Any other comments not covered in the questions

The Local Plan is rather lacking in relation to Heritage and Archaeology. It will be important that sites we have highlighted as amber and red risk are fully assessed.

The recommendations about archaeological interest and risk in the RAG assessment which have been submitted by ESCC Archaeology Section to Rother DC in January 2017 for each of the site allocations should appear in the texts for each of the site allocation documents in Part 2 of the Local Plan (DaSA). In that way an early understanding of the key issues will be available to those using the plan documents.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 2: Do you agree that the optional water efficiency standard should be adopted and the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 23694

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Page 23

Yes.

Full text:

Ecology
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Page 23

Yes.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.