Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New search
New search
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 102: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Winchelsea in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317
Yes this retains growth within the post-medieval core and does not impact the abandoned medieval sections of the town. However consideration should be given to the very high potential for archaeological remains, including medieval cellars, as well as the large number of extant historic buildings.
-GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317
Yes this retains growth within the post-medieval core and does not impact the abandoned medieval sections of the town. However consideration should be given to the very high potential for archaeological remains, including medieval cellars, as well as the large number of extant historic buildings.
-GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 103: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Winchelsea Beach? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317
Winchelsea Beach
The Smeatons Harbour section of this area has a high archaeological potential.
-GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317
Winchelsea Beach
The Smeatons Harbour section of this area has a high archaeological potential.
-GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 104: Do you agree with the preferred sites for permanent Gypsy and Traveller pitches across the District? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Gypsies and Travellers
The sites would need to be assessed in relation to archaeological potential and areas of significant remains scoped out.
-AMBER
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Gypsies and Travellers
The sites would need to be assessed in relation to archaeological potential and areas of significant remains scoped out.
-AMBER
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 105: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy GYP1, including the boundary as defined on the Policies Map? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Gypsies and Travellers
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Gypsies and Travellers
The site has a medium potential to contain prehistoric, Roman and medieval remains. Planning application would be expected to include an archaeological assessment in line with NPPF.
-GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 108: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy GUE1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot
The site is heavily disturbed and of no archaeological interest
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot
The site is heavily disturbed and of no archaeological interest
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 109: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy (MAR1)? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Marley Lane
The site already carried an archaeological planning condition RR/3165/CC, so future applications would be expected to be consistent - GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Marley Lane
The site already carried an archaeological planning condition RR/3165/CC, so future applications would be expected to be consistent - GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 110: Do you agree with a policy to support the continued allocation for the re-instatement of the railway link from Robertsbridge to Bodiam along its original route?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Rother Valley Railway
Yes, although consideration must be given to archaeological costs in recording the industrial / railway archaeology - GREEN
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Rother Valley Railway
Yes, although consideration must be given to archaeological costs in recording the industrial / railway archaeology - GREEN
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 107: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Guestling Green? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot
Yes
Full text:
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Guestling Green- Land at former highway depot
Yes
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 111: Do you have any comments on this scope or content of the new Local Plan that are not covered by other questions?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Archaeology
The Local Plan is rather lacking in relation to Heritage and Archaeology. It will be important that sites we have highlighted as amber and red risk are fully assessed.
The recommendations about archaeological interest and risk in the RAG assessment which have been submitted by ESCC Archaeology Section to Rother DC in January 2017 for each of the site allocations should appear in the texts for each of the site allocation documents in Part 2 of the Local Plan (DaSA). In that way an early understanding of the key issues will be available to those using the plan documents.
Full text:
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Any other comments not covered in the questions
The Local Plan is rather lacking in relation to Heritage and Archaeology. It will be important that sites we have highlighted as amber and red risk are fully assessed.
The recommendations about archaeological interest and risk in the RAG assessment which have been submitted by ESCC Archaeology Section to Rother DC in January 2017 for each of the site allocations should appear in the texts for each of the site allocation documents in Part 2 of the Local Plan (DaSA). In that way an early understanding of the key issues will be available to those using the plan documents.
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 2: Do you agree that the optional water efficiency standard should be adopted and the proposed policy wording?
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Representation Summary:
Ecology
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Page 23
Yes.
Full text:
Ecology
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Page 23
Yes.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.