Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 23693
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
The Local Plan is rather lacking in relation to Heritage and Archaeology. It will be important that sites we have highlighted as amber and red risk are fully assessed.
The recommendations about archaeological interest and risk in the RAG assessment which have been submitted by ESCC Archaeology Section to Rother DC in January 2017 for each of the site allocations should appear in the texts for each of the site allocation documents in Part 2 of the Local Plan (DaSA). In that way an early understanding of the key issues will be available to those using the plan documents.
Archaeology
OTHER POLICIES Page 337
Any other comments not covered in the questions
The Local Plan is rather lacking in relation to Heritage and Archaeology. It will be important that sites we have highlighted as amber and red risk are fully assessed.
The recommendations about archaeological interest and risk in the RAG assessment which have been submitted by ESCC Archaeology Section to Rother DC in January 2017 for each of the site allocations should appear in the texts for each of the site allocation documents in Part 2 of the Local Plan (DaSA). In that way an early understanding of the key issues will be available to those using the plan documents.