Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 22: Do you agree with the policy approach to land stability and the proposed policy wording?
Representation ID: 23705
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology.
-Land stability
Yes
Ecology.
-Land stability
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 23: Do you agree with the policy approach to managing environmental pollution through the planning process and with the proposed policy wording?
Representation ID: 23706
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
-Environmental Pollution
Point ii) of the policy should be amended to "...has regard to the lighting levels recommended by the ILP for the relevant environmental zone... and to the Bat Conservation Trust's (BCT) advice - Artificial lighting and wildlife. Interim Guidance: recommendations to help minimise the impact artificial lighting.
Ecology
-Environmental Pollution
Point ii) of the policy should be amended to "...has regard to the lighting levels recommended by the ILP for the relevant environmental zone... and to the Bat Conservation Trust's (BCT) advice - Artificial lighting and wildlife. Interim Guidance: recommendations to help minimise the impact artificial lighting.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 24: Do you agree with the policy approach to comprehensive development and the proposed policy wording?
Representation ID: 23707
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
IMPLEMENTATION Page 11
-Comprehensive development
Yes.
Ecology
IMPLEMENTATION Page 11
-Comprehensive development
Yes.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 25: Do you agree with the proposed policy wording on development boundaries?
Representation ID: 23708
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
IMPLEMENTATION Page 115
-Development boundaries
Yes.
The following comments are made assuming that all developments will be assessed for their ecological impacts, and that if ecological assets are such that appropriate mitigation and/or compensation cannot be provided, the development should not go ahead. It should be recognised that LEAPs and LAPs can have ecological impacts and therefore may not always be appropriate within landscape buffer areas, ecological areas etc.
If grid references had been provided for allocated sites, more detailed comments could have been provided.
Ecology
IMPLEMENTATION Page 115
-Development boundaries
Yes.
The following comments are made assuming that all developments will be assessed for their ecological impacts, and that if ecological assets are such that appropriate mitigation and/or compensation cannot be provided, the development should not go ahead. It should be recognised that LEAPs and LAPs can have ecological impacts and therefore may not always be appropriate within landscape buffer areas, ecological areas etc.
If grid references had been provided for allocated sites, more detailed comments could have been provided.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 26: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23709
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology.
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX1: Land at Levetts Wood and Oaktree Farm, Sidley
Yes.
Ecology.
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX1: Land at Levetts Wood and Oaktree Farm, Sidley
Yes.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 28: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23710
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX2: Land at Preston Hall Farm, Sidley
Yes.
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX2: Land at Preston Hall Farm, Sidley
Yes.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 29: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX3? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23711
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX3: Land at North Bexhill
viii) should be amended to state "... with arrangements for its implementation and long term management."
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
-Policy BEX3: Land at North Bexhill
viii) should be amended to state "... with arrangements for its implementation and long term management."
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 31: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX5? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23712
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 32: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX6? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23713
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 33: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX7? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23714
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes
