Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Search representations
Results for Devine Homes search
New searchObject
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
7.34
Representation ID: 20521
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The size and scale of existing settlements and the level of services is the appropriate starting point for assessing the housing distribution stategy for the district. Although environment issues such as ANOB are factors in consideration of this strategy no evaluation of the impact of development on the setting of the ANOB has been considered by the Council. As a significant area of the District is covered in ANOB such an assessment of the strategic settlement of Robertsbridge has undervalued its future potential for sustainable development.
The size and scale of existing settlements and the level of services is the appropriate starting point for assessing the housing distribution stategy for the district. Although environment issues such as ANOB are factors in consideration of this strategy no evaluation of the impact of development on the setting of the ANOB has been considered by the Council. As a significant area of the District is covered in ANOB such an assessment of the strategic settlement of Robertsbridge has undervalued its future potential for sustainable development.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
7.36
Representation ID: 20522
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Councils assessment of submitted housing site is flawed in particular assessments made in consideration of landscape impact and highway. We submitted reps on these assessment to Rother DC and have had no reply formally or through the SHLAA that these issues have now been addressed by the Council
The Councils assessment of submitted housing site is flawed in particular assessments made in consideration of landscape impact and highway. We submitted reps on these assessment to Rother DC and have had no reply formally or through the SHLAA that these issues have now been addressed by the Council
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
7.41
Representation ID: 20523
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The role of the Rural Settlements has not been propoerly investigated by the Council in light of the issues raised in para 3.37 to 7.40 regards the districts housing strategy or contingency to ensure the broad housing needs of the district are met
The role of the Rural Settlements has not been propoerly investigated by the Council in light of the issues raised in para 3.37 to 7.40 regards the districts housing strategy or contingency to ensure the broad housing needs of the district are met
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy OSS1 - Overall Spatial Development Strategy
Representation ID: 20524
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Provide appropriate housing provision at sustainable rural settlements that can deliver the housing numbers needed in the district to meet its broad housing needs over the plan period
Provide appropriate housing provision at sustainable rural settlements that can deliver the housing numbers needed in the district to meet its broad housing needs over the plan period
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Figure 8: Approximate Development Levels
Representation ID: 20525
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Robertsbridge should not be placed within the catagory of "villages" as this under estimates its role within the distict as the signual largest settlement out side the coastal towns of Bexhill Battle & Rye.
Robertsbridge has a more important role than being classified under the blanket catagory of villages.
Robertsbridge should not be placed within the catagory of "villages" as this under estimates its role within the distict as the signual largest settlement out side the coastal towns of Bexhill Battle & Rye.
Robertsbridge has a more important role than being classified under the blanket catagory of villages.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
7.51
Representation ID: 20526
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Council refer in para 7.50 that there are 1300 dwellings with outstanding planning permission. Para 7.51 states that there is local plan allocations of 1750. They acknowledge these site have not been reviewed which they should have done to assess how robust this figure is.
In any event these figures should be applied to the robust SE Plan figure of 5600 which would leave you with a need of 2550 dwellings in the Core Strategy to meet its overall target.
The Council refer in para 7.50 that there are 1300 dwellings with outstanding planning permission. Para 7.51 states that there is local plan allocations of 1750. They acknowledge these site have not been reviewed which they should have done to assess how robust this figure is.
In any event these figures should be applied to the robust SE Plan figure of 5600 which would leave you with a need of 2550 dwellings in the Core Strategy to meet its overall target.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
7.57
Representation ID: 20527
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Council have suggested a windfall allowance for 225 dwellings over the last 5 yrs of the plan. The Council do not need to rely on these figures if they undertook a robust assessment of the sites in the SHLAA measured against a robust landscape capacity assessment of potential sites unlikely to have an impact on the ANOB eg Land off Bishop Lane, Robertsbridge (RB1) amongst others. The Council has failed to give " compelling evidence that prevent specific sites being identifid" NPPF
The Council have suggested a windfall allowance for 225 dwellings over the last 5 yrs of the plan. The Council do not need to rely on these figures if they undertook a robust assessment of the sites in the SHLAA measured against a robust landscape capacity assessment of potential sites unlikely to have an impact on the ANOB eg Land off Bishop Lane, Robertsbridge (RB1) amongst others. The Council has failed to give " compelling evidence that prevent specific sites being identifid" NPPF
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
7.58
Representation ID: 20528
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Council have already identified the risk that its housing requirements will not be meet with reference to the uncertainity over the Bexhill Link Rd.Yet the Council has failed to set out ahousing implementation strategy describing how they will maintain delivery of a 5 yr supply of housing land to meet the housing need target.
The Council have already identified the risk that its housing requirements will not be meet with reference to the uncertainity over the Bexhill Link Rd.Yet the Council has failed to set out ahousing implementation strategy describing how they will maintain delivery of a 5 yr supply of housing land to meet the housing need target.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
7.65
Representation ID: 20529
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The limited capacity for growth of the Rural settlements has not been fully investigated by the Council. As previously stated the Council have not assessed the impact of greater growth of settlements like Robertsbridge to cope with more housing and its impact on the ANOB. There are sites that could be developed that would not have a significant or demonstrable impact on the ANOB.
The limited capacity for growth of the Rural settlements has not been fully investigated by the Council. As previously stated the Council have not assessed the impact of greater growth of settlements like Robertsbridge to cope with more housing and its impact on the ANOB. There are sites that could be developed that would not have a significant or demonstrable impact on the ANOB.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy OSS2: Bexhill to Hastings Link Road and development
Representation ID: 20530
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Policy OSS2 does not accord with PPS3 or draft NPPF. It fails to provide any contingency on its 5yr supply or identify a supply of specific developable sites. It fails to meet the districts broad housing needs. It is not justified, effective or consistant with national policy
Policy OSS2 does not accord with PPS3 or draft NPPF. It fails to provide any contingency on its 5yr supply or identify a supply of specific developable sites. It fails to meet the districts broad housing needs. It is not justified, effective or consistant with national policy
