Support

Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and Regulation 123 List

Representation ID: 21680

Received: 26/09/2014

Respondent: Sussex Police

Representation Summary:

The Infrastructure Funding Gap Analysis identifies a significant funding gap for the infrastructure needed to support development. Whilst Analysis does not specify all types of infrastructure required, including Sussex Police infrastructure set out in our IDP representation of June 2014. Sussex Police consider that their infrastructure requirements, needed solely to support new growth, will also contribute towards further widening of this gap.

Sussex Police agree that there is a significant funding gap across the District. This funding gap is clear, based on the information provided, and justifys the need to charge the levy.

Full text:

The Infrastructure Funding Gap Analysis identifies a significant funding gap for the provision of infrastructure, across the Rother District, needed to support development coming forward in the Core Strategy. Whilst the Analysis does not specify all types of infrastructure required, including Sussex Police infrastructure set out in our IDP representation of June 2014, paragraph 1.11 sets out that additional service provision will contribute towards the widening of the infrastructure gap. Sussex Police consider that their infrastructure requirements, needed solely to support new growth, will also contribute towards further widening of this gap.

Sussex Police therefore agree that there is a significant infrastructure funding gap across the District. The existence of this funding gap is clear, based on the information provided, and gives justification on the need to charge the levy.