Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

Search representations

Results for Guestling Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

111. Specifically, what are your views on requiring the submission of appropriate evidence to demonstrate that there is, or will be, sufficient infrastructure capacity to meet the demands of a new development?

Representation ID: 27241

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Agree.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

112. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on digital connectivity?

Representation ID: 27242

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The policy seems sound but will be reliant on a very reluctant Open Reach to replace considerable lengths of overhead copper wires.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

113. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?

Representation ID: 27243

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Can the Council try and ensure that any new fibre infrastructure between the cabinet and any new site benefits existing properties currently served by substandard overhead wiring.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

33. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on walking, wheeling, cycling and public transport (outside the site)?

Representation ID: 27244

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed policies appear relevant to urban areas but do not consider how the objectives will be achieved in villages or rural areas

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

34. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?

Representation ID: 27245

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed policies appear relevant to urban areas but do not consider how the objectives will be achieved in villages or rural areas

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

35. Specifically, what are your views on the requirements set regarding public transport, such as the 400m walking distance proximity requirement?

Representation ID: 27246

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed policies appear relevant to urban areas but do not consider how the objectives will be achieved in villages or rural areas

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

77. Do you agree with the principal identified by the Council of achieving a stepped housing delivery with greater levels of delivery planned for later in the plan period?

Representation ID: 27247

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The proposal for greater levels of planned housing delivery later in the plan period does not properly address the current housing shortage particularly as previous delivery targets have not been met.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

82. What are your views on the Council's approach to development boundaries?

Representation ID: 27248

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The proposed policy should be adopted. It is important to retain development boundaries for villages and rural settlements and an essential consideration when looking at planning applications. Agree that priority should be given to developing brownfield sites.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

114. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on mixed and balanced communities?

Representation ID: 27250

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Policy HOU 1 Policy does not address the issue of developers changing the mix part way during a project. The requirement in 8.15 for development of 6 or more houses to provide a mix sets the level too high and should be lower to address the excessive building of 4+ bed executive homes

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

116. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on affordable housing?

Representation ID: 27251

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Guestling Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Proposed Policy HOU2 on Affordable Housing is correct. Insufficient information is given in the Reg 18 Commentary to be able the answer Q118 [affordable housing v CIL]

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.