Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

We agree with the proposed allocation of sites for permanent gypsy and traveller pitches.

We agree with the policy to support Policy RVR1 with the specific criteria set out therein.

The PC supports the principle of neighbourhood planning and the confirmation in 5.1 that once adopted, a NP has the same status as local plans. It is to be noted that the Robertsbridge NP has moved on to 'Stage 4'.

We have referred where we felt it relevant, to the lack of policies introduced in this DaSA, given that the opportunity has been taken to update and improve core policies adopted in the 2014 Core Strategy. We have referred to the lack of policy:
* to confirm the need for investment in the Green Infrastructure Network; and
* to assist in the reuse of contaminated land, which should require updating work being done on the RDC monitored Register of Contaminated Land.

We also feel that the Transport policies of the Core Strategy could be improved. For example TRI(iv) where it talks about capacity and capability of improvement, should specifically refer to such matters as station infrastructure, including on-site parking provision.

Also, there is little evidence of support for the maintenance and improvement of bridleways and footpaths, which are needed in the pursuit of improved health for all and improvement in leisure capacity. We suggest a policy which positively supports the development of improved footpaths and bridleways, ensuring that any new development has connections with the foot and bridle path network where this is possible.

On average, homes built in the UK have smaller room sizes than other Western European countries, so we welcome imposition of minimum internal space standards.

On accessibility, we wish to see Option C (higher standard) even though the scope for sites of 50+ are limited in rural areas, but we would wish to see older people have the opportunity to live in appropriate accommodation in their home villages if possible.

Specifically regarding options for Older People, we feel that suitable options for rural developments would be your options A, C, D, E, especially as Robertsbridge is a rural service centre.

On average, homes built in the UK have smaller room sizes than other Western European countries, so we welcome imposition of minimum internal space standards.

On accessibility, we wish to see Option C (higher standard) even though the scope for sites of 50+ are limited in rural areas, but we would wish to see older people have the opportunity to live in appropriate accommodation in their home villages if possible.

Specifically regarding options for Older People, we feel that suitable options for rural developments would be your options A, C, D, E, especially as Robertsbridge is a rural service centre.