Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 98: Do you agree with the recommendations regarding thedevelopment boundaries at Pett and Friar's Hill? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this sett

Representation ID: 23766

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 99: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Pett Level? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement?

Representation ID: 23767

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 100: Do you agree with the recommendation regarding the development boundary at Staplecross? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement?

Representation ID: 23768

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 101: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Three Oaks in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to

Representation ID: 23769

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 102: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Winchelsea in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to

Representation ID: 23770

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 103: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Winchelsea Beach? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement

Representation ID: 23771

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 105: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy GYP1, including the boundary as defined on the Policies Map? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23772

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Gypsies and Travellers

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Gypsies and Travellers

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 107: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Guestling Green? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?

Representation ID: 23773

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green -Land at former highway depot

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green -Land at former highway depot

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 108: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy GUE1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23774

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green -Land at former highway depot

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Guestling Green -Land at former highway depot

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 109: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy (MAR1)? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 23775

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Marley Lane

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER POLICIES Page 337

Marley Lane

Yes

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.