Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for East Sussex County Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 57: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEC2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23736
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Beckley Four Oaks
Yes
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Beckley Four Oaks
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 58: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23737
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Beckley Four Oaks
Yes
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Beckley Four Oaks
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 60: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BRO1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23738
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Broadly yes, although an additional buffer may be required to mitigate indirect impacts of residential development (e.g. increased predation) on the adjacent woodland and the species it supports.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Broadly yes, although an additional buffer may be required to mitigate indirect impacts of residential development (e.g. increased predation) on the adjacent woodland and the species it supports.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 61: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BRO2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23739
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Depending on the ecological value of the meadow (e.g. if it is a S41 Habitat of Principal Importance), mitigation/compensation for the loss of grassland may be required.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Depending on the ecological value of the meadow (e.g. if it is a S41 Habitat of Principal Importance), mitigation/compensation for the loss of grassland may be required.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 62: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23740
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Yes, depending on the ecological value of the meadow (e.g. if it is a S41 Habitat of Principal Importance), mitigation/compensation for the loss of grassland may be required.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Broad Oak
Yes, depending on the ecological value of the meadow (e.g. if it is a S41 Habitat of Principal Importance), mitigation/compensation for the loss of grassland may be required.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 63: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Camber? If not, which sites should be preferred?
Representation ID: 23741
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 64: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy CAM1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23742
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 65: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy CAM2? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23743
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 66: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23744
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 68: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy CAT1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 23745
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
Yes
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Catsfield
Yes
