Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Search representations

Results for Sedlescombe Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy LHN2: Affordable Housing

Representation ID: 20611

Received: 21/09/2011

Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

LHN2(iv)(a) The "Affordable Housing" background paper mentions that affordable housing should be provided in rural areas where there is a "demonstrable need" and not in accordance with a blanket percentage figure of houses to be provided. Villages which already have a greater percentage of affordable housing than the average of the District should not be required to add further to that stock. With the latest Housing Needs Survey in this parish being ten years ago, it is not likely that up-to-date information regarding need will be available when housing development is proposed.

Full text:

LHN2(iv)(a) The "Affordable Housing" background paper mentions that affordable housing should be provided in rural areas where there is a "demonstrable need" and not in accordance with a blanket percentage figure of houses to be provided. Villages which already have a greater percentage of affordable housing than the average of the District should not be required to add further to that stock. With the latest Housing Needs Survey in this parish being ten years ago, it is not likely that up-to-date information regarding need will be available when housing development is proposed.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

15.30

Representation ID: 20612

Received: 21/09/2011

Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The requirement for affordable housing included in a development of houses to be indistinguishable from marketed properties is not justified and, if considered with Policy LHN1(ii) for properties in rural aras to be one or two bedroom dwellings, all properties in the rural areas will, in the future, be small. This will not provide sufficient family size homes to support our local primary school.

Full text:

The requirement for affordable housing included in a development of houses to be indistinguishable from marketed properties is not justified and, if considered with Policy LHN1(ii) for properties in rural aras to be one or two bedroom dwellings, all properties in the rural areas will, in the future, be small. This will not provide sufficient family size homes to support our local primary school.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy LHN2: Affordable Housing

Representation ID: 20613

Received: 21/09/2011

Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Robust justification for seeking developer contributions in lieu of onsite provision of affordable housing on the scale proposed as stated in PPS3 has not been provided.

Full text:

Robust justification for seeking developer contributions in lieu of onsite provision of affordable housing on the scale proposed as stated in PPS3 has not been provided.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

16.47

Representation ID: 20614

Received: 21/09/2011

Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Error in Chapter Number - should be 12 - rural areas. It is not justified to omit farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy.

Full text:

Error in Chapter Number - should be 12 - rural areas. It is not justified to omit farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy RA1: Villages

Representation ID: 20615

Received: 21/09/2011

Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The omission of farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy is not justified.

Full text:

The omission of farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy is not justified.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy TR2: Integrated Transport

Representation ID: 20616

Received: 21/09/2011

Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

To be effective the location of the proposed cycle network needs to be specified as the existing bridleway network is insufficient and all roads in the District are narrow and unsuitable for installation of cycleways.

Full text:

To be effective the location of the proposed cycle network needs to be specified as the existing bridleway network is insufficient and all roads in the District are narrow and unsuitable for installation of cycleways.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.