Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Search representations
Results for Sedlescombe Parish Council search
New searchObject
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy LHN2: Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 20611
Received: 21/09/2011
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
LHN2(iv)(a) The "Affordable Housing" background paper mentions that affordable housing should be provided in rural areas where there is a "demonstrable need" and not in accordance with a blanket percentage figure of houses to be provided. Villages which already have a greater percentage of affordable housing than the average of the District should not be required to add further to that stock. With the latest Housing Needs Survey in this parish being ten years ago, it is not likely that up-to-date information regarding need will be available when housing development is proposed.
LHN2(iv)(a) The "Affordable Housing" background paper mentions that affordable housing should be provided in rural areas where there is a "demonstrable need" and not in accordance with a blanket percentage figure of houses to be provided. Villages which already have a greater percentage of affordable housing than the average of the District should not be required to add further to that stock. With the latest Housing Needs Survey in this parish being ten years ago, it is not likely that up-to-date information regarding need will be available when housing development is proposed.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
15.30
Representation ID: 20612
Received: 21/09/2011
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The requirement for affordable housing included in a development of houses to be indistinguishable from marketed properties is not justified and, if considered with Policy LHN1(ii) for properties in rural aras to be one or two bedroom dwellings, all properties in the rural areas will, in the future, be small. This will not provide sufficient family size homes to support our local primary school.
The requirement for affordable housing included in a development of houses to be indistinguishable from marketed properties is not justified and, if considered with Policy LHN1(ii) for properties in rural aras to be one or two bedroom dwellings, all properties in the rural areas will, in the future, be small. This will not provide sufficient family size homes to support our local primary school.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy LHN2: Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 20613
Received: 21/09/2011
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Robust justification for seeking developer contributions in lieu of onsite provision of affordable housing on the scale proposed as stated in PPS3 has not been provided.
Robust justification for seeking developer contributions in lieu of onsite provision of affordable housing on the scale proposed as stated in PPS3 has not been provided.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
16.47
Representation ID: 20614
Received: 21/09/2011
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Error in Chapter Number - should be 12 - rural areas. It is not justified to omit farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy.
Error in Chapter Number - should be 12 - rural areas. It is not justified to omit farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy RA1: Villages
Representation ID: 20615
Received: 21/09/2011
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The omission of farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy is not justified.
The omission of farm shops, garden centres etc which are part of the rural economy is not justified.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy TR2: Integrated Transport
Representation ID: 20616
Received: 21/09/2011
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
To be effective the location of the proposed cycle network needs to be specified as the existing bridleway network is insufficient and all roads in the District are narrow and unsuitable for installation of cycleways.
To be effective the location of the proposed cycle network needs to be specified as the existing bridleway network is insufficient and all roads in the District are narrow and unsuitable for installation of cycleways.