Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Search representations

Results for Crowhurst Park search

New search New search

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 1 - Vision for the Future

Representation ID: 20215

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Housing provision is a key issue for the Core Strategy that should be reflected in the Core Strategy's 'Vision for Rother in 2026' with an explicit reference that the District will have provided every opportunity for a mix of quality homes in a wide variety of locations throughout the District.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 2 - Aim and Objectives of Spatial Development Strategy

Representation ID: 20216

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Notwithstanding Box 3 (a) it is felt that an explicit objective should be added that the Council will meet its regional housing requirements by promoting good quality development through site allocations in both urban and non-urban (greenfield) locations.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 3 - Preferred Strategy for Overall Spatial Development

Representation ID: 20217

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

The principle to promote opportunities for extensions to the urban fringe with Hastings Borough Council is supported, notably where this objective applies to land to the east of Breadsell Lane/south of Battle Road.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

5. Overall spatial Development Strategy

Representation ID: 20223

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Table on Page 30

The housing proposals set out in the table for the Hastings fringes are supported in principle as an associated part of development of land in Hastings Borough for housing b ) Opportunities for the early release of land in this location should be prioritised.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 8 - Shared Vision for Bexhill and Hastings

Representation ID: 20224

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 6.11

The shared objective in objective 4 is supported as a principle. Greater emphasis needs to be given in the text to providing encouragement for new housing to be brought forward for development.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 10 - Preferred Strategy for Bexhill

Representation ID: 20226

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Paragraphs 6.26 to 6.38

It is considered that the contribution that the land at Breadsell Lane can make should be more explicit in these sections. The development of this land within Hastings Borough is explicit in their emerging LDF and this should be reflected in Box 10. Whilst options north-east of Bexhill, North of Bexhill and west of Bexhill are considered in paragraphs 6.32-6.38, opportunities associated with the north west Hastings fringe do not appear to be included in any obvious way. This needs to be more explicit in the Box and in its preamble.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 11 - Preferred Strategy for Hastings Fringes

Representation ID: 20228

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

(c) (ii)

The proposal to include land to the south of Battle Road for new housing development as part of a larger scheme within Hastings Borough is supported. It is suggested that the policy should also provide for a potential access to Battle Road and that new housing in this location should first be in association with land in this immediate area.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 11 - Preferred Strategy for Hastings Fringes

Representation ID: 20229

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

(c) (iii)

As drafted, it appears that (iii) could contradict the objectives in (i) and (ii). Paragraph (iii) needs to be revised so that it is clear that its objectives refer to proposals beyond those in (i) and (ii).

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

6. Bexhill and Hastings Fringes

Representation ID: 20230

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 6.56

The strategy to release land within Rother District as a part of the wider proposed land allocation in Hastings Borough (land east of Breadsell Lane) should not be dependant on the provision of a new station at Wilting. As drafted, it could be construed that the entire Strategy for the Hastings fringes will require such provision. This may be a justifiable prerequisite for the release of land around Wilting itself but, it is suggested, this should be a specific requirement for that specific area of land only. Paragraph 6.56 should therefore be revised to make this distinction clear.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

6. Bexhill and Hastings Fringes

Representation ID: 20239

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Park

Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 6.58

Support is given to include landowners and developers within the group of 'lead agencies and partners' for development and housing at the Hastings fringes. To be effective as a policy, regular communication with landowners is needed throughout the LDF and Allocations Document processes.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.