Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Search representations
Results for Crowhurst Park search
New searchComment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 1 - Vision for the Future
Representation ID: 20215
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
Housing provision is a key issue for the Core Strategy that should be reflected in the Core Strategy's 'Vision for Rother in 2026' with an explicit reference that the District will have provided every opportunity for a mix of quality homes in a wide variety of locations throughout the District.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 2 - Aim and Objectives of Spatial Development Strategy
Representation ID: 20216
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
Notwithstanding Box 3 (a) it is felt that an explicit objective should be added that the Council will meet its regional housing requirements by promoting good quality development through site allocations in both urban and non-urban (greenfield) locations.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 3 - Preferred Strategy for Overall Spatial Development
Representation ID: 20217
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
The principle to promote opportunities for extensions to the urban fringe with Hastings Borough Council is supported, notably where this objective applies to land to the east of Breadsell Lane/south of Battle Road.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
5. Overall spatial Development Strategy
Representation ID: 20223
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
Table on Page 30
The housing proposals set out in the table for the Hastings fringes are supported in principle as an associated part of development of land in Hastings Borough for housing b ) Opportunities for the early release of land in this location should be prioritised.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 8 - Shared Vision for Bexhill and Hastings
Representation ID: 20224
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
Paragraph 6.11
The shared objective in objective 4 is supported as a principle. Greater emphasis needs to be given in the text to providing encouragement for new housing to be brought forward for development.
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 10 - Preferred Strategy for Bexhill
Representation ID: 20226
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
Paragraphs 6.26 to 6.38
It is considered that the contribution that the land at Breadsell Lane can make should be more explicit in these sections. The development of this land within Hastings Borough is explicit in their emerging LDF and this should be reflected in Box 10. Whilst options north-east of Bexhill, North of Bexhill and west of Bexhill are considered in paragraphs 6.32-6.38, opportunities associated with the north west Hastings fringe do not appear to be included in any obvious way. This needs to be more explicit in the Box and in its preamble.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 11 - Preferred Strategy for Hastings Fringes
Representation ID: 20228
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
(c) (ii)
The proposal to include land to the south of Battle Road for new housing development as part of a larger scheme within Hastings Borough is supported. It is suggested that the policy should also provide for a potential access to Battle Road and that new housing in this location should first be in association with land in this immediate area.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 11 - Preferred Strategy for Hastings Fringes
Representation ID: 20229
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
(c) (iii)
As drafted, it appears that (iii) could contradict the objectives in (i) and (ii). Paragraph (iii) needs to be revised so that it is clear that its objectives refer to proposals beyond those in (i) and (ii).
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
6. Bexhill and Hastings Fringes
Representation ID: 20230
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
Paragraph 6.56
The strategy to release land within Rother District as a part of the wider proposed land allocation in Hastings Borough (land east of Breadsell Lane) should not be dependant on the provision of a new station at Wilting. As drafted, it could be construed that the entire Strategy for the Hastings fringes will require such provision. This may be a justifiable prerequisite for the release of land around Wilting itself but, it is suggested, this should be a specific requirement for that specific area of land only. Paragraph 6.56 should therefore be revised to make this distinction clear.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
6. Bexhill and Hastings Fringes
Representation ID: 20239
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Park
Agent: Kember Loudon Williams Ltd
Paragraph 6.58
Support is given to include landowners and developers within the group of 'lead agencies and partners' for development and housing at the Hastings fringes. To be effective as a policy, regular communication with landowners is needed throughout the LDF and Allocations Document processes.
