Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Search representations
Results for Crowhurst Society search
New searchComment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 26 - (c) For tourism
Representation ID: 19849
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
Why are the Task Force and SeaSpace being included here again? Neither are elected and neither are accountable democratically to the electorate. As agencies with known 'interests' they need to be kept at a distance from documents such as this which purport to represent the interests of the RDC electorate alone.
Parish Council not included!
C) Yes. Too little emphasis on the part tourism can play in regeneration -particularly informal amenity use of open spaces.
Need to work to raise the 1066 historical connection- as Bayeux has done!
Development of rural visitor centres in local area- e.g. an ancient farming centre at Upper Wilting! (farmed continuously for 2500years)
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 27 - Aims and Objectives for the Environment
Representation ID: 19850
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
Why is design placed above the protection of the natural environment in this list? Surely the current i) should be last in the objectives.
The objectives other than the current i) are excellent particularly VII.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
12. Environment
Representation ID: 19851
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
12.3 Needs to be enshrined as a guiding principle.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 28 - Preferred Strategy for Landscape Stewardship
Representation ID: 19852
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
There needs to be a strong presumption against development in our most fragile areas. Vital to ensure survival of v), vi), vii), viii).
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 30 - Preferred Strategy for Biodiversity and Greenspace
Representation ID: 19853
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
Need to secure finance to implement this key strategy. This too, needs to be a mantra to ensure that Sussex does not become like so many other rural areas - concreted over.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Water Supply and Wastewater Resource
Representation ID: 19854
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
12.36 Presumption here that development takes place. In the absence of development how will RDC finance water targets?
12.37 Agreed.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 33 - Preferred Strategy for Flood Risk
Representation ID: 19855
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
f) Vital if low lying communities are to survive. As global warming raises water levels more stringent planning tools are needed to protect communities.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Flood Risk
Representation ID: 19856
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
12.39 Control of any development in flood plains needs to be mandatory.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
12. Environment
Representation ID: 19857
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
12.45 Local Parish Councils need to be involved and made aware of the support that can be provided.All Parishes in low lying areas need a flood defence plan.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 36 - Aim and Objectives
Representation ID: 19858
Received: 04/02/2009
Respondent: Crowhurst Society
Fragile areas need protection from developers who would build in rural areas and then provide infrastructure that destroys the area.