Core Strategy Issues & Options

Search representations

Results for Persimmon Homes South East search

New search New search

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Question 1 re. the key issues for development and change up to 2026

Representation ID: 18890

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Persimmon Homes South East

Agent: Bell Cornwell

Representation Summary:

We consider that the themes do not properly reflect the need to provide in a timely manner, the strategic housing requirements. Our view is that there is a probability that the overall housing numbers for the Rother District will rise. In the meantime we consider that it will be unsound to proceed on the basis that the current Structure Plan figures will provide the basis for the Core Strategy. The Preferred Options stage of the Core Strategy should therefore either be delayed until the regional context becomes clear or it should be robust enough to possibly accommodate substantially higher levels of housing.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Question 2 re. managing future uncertainties

Representation ID: 18891

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Persimmon Homes South East

Agent: Bell Cornwell

Representation Summary:

In terms of housing, the most appropriate rate of growth for Rother is that which is consistent with The South East Plan when it is finally approved.

In wider terms, the Core Strategy has to be robust enough to accommodate a range of options. Realistic spatial options should be properly considered and assessed through the SA/SEA process and set out clearly when the Preferred Options are published.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Question 4 re. planning for the diverse needs of all sections of local communities

Representation ID: 18892

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Persimmon Homes South East

Agent: Bell Cornwell

Representation Summary:

We assume that the range and mix of housing will be the subject of a Housing Market Assessment in due course.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Question 7 re. meeting development demands in ways responsive to local and global environmental considerations

Representation ID: 18893

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Persimmon Homes South East

Agent: Bell Cornwell

Representation Summary:

New development has to fit in with the local environment, indeed enhance it where possible.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Question 9 re. general principles for guiding the location of development up to 2026

Representation ID: 18894

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Persimmon Homes South East

Agent: Bell Cornwell

Representation Summary:

We broadly support the principles set out in paragraph 4.1 on page 26 insofar as it follows the principles set out in Local Plan Policies DS1 and DS2. In this context we note that sub-paragraph (iv) of policy DS2 provides for limited growth of selected villages that contain a range of services. Northiam falls within that category. This principle should be at the top of any list as a priority, and other principles made subservient to that objective. PPS3 has now replaced PPG 3 and places different emphasis on the criteria to be used in identifying suitable location for new housing. Northiam falls within this criterion and should be considered for new housing growth.

Comment

Core Strategy Issues & Options

Question 21 re. options for the distribution of new development in rural areas

Representation ID: 18895

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Persimmon Homes South East

Agent: Bell Cornwell

Representation Summary:

There should be some dispersal of development around the rural areas. In broad terms, however, this should be focussed more on the larger settlements such as Northiam, which have a number of local facilities. Endorse option 1 (Continue to focus on service centres), as it complies with the advice in PPS3.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.