Object
Proposed Submission Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan
Representation ID: 24290
Received: 06/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Shirley Anderson
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
REPRESENTATION BEX9 - SUDS
The applicant has not demonstrated they have seriously considered the impact of the polluting factors on the Pevensey levels Ramsar site. The answer probably lies in the fact they cannot due to the location of the existing areas that are protected. The applicant cannot provide the guarantee that no lasting damage will be incurred and quite simply are not interested in these factors. This application should have been turned aside long ago for these reasons.
Again there are technical submissions objecting to the application but I would summarise as follows -
In this case and at this location the effects on the watercourses and fluvial ecosystem of the Eastern part of the Pevensey Levels SAC, RAMSAR and SSSI WOULD BE disastrous. No amount of engineering could mitigate these effects to protect the Pevensey Levels.
This application should be refused.
REPRESENTATION BEX9 - SUDS
The applicant has not demonstrated they have seriously considered the impact of the polluting factors on the Pevensey levels Ramsar site. The answer probably lies in the fact they cannot due to the location of the existing areas that are protected. The applicant cannot provide the guarantee that no lasting damage will be incurred and quite simply are not interested in these factors. This application should have been turned aside long ago for these reasons.
Again there are technical submissions objecting to the application but I would summarise as follows -
In this case and at this location the effects on the watercourses and fluvial ecosystem of the Eastern part of the Pevensey Levels SAC, RAMSAR and SSSI WOULD BE disastrous. No amount of engineering could mitigate these effects to protect the Pevensey Levels.
This application should be refused.