Object
Proposed Submission Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan
Representation ID: 24077
Received: 30/11/2018
Respondent: Mrs Bridget Adkins
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
RR/2017/1705/P DaSA Part II Policy BEX9 (Spindlewood)
As a result of the CJEU April 2018 ruling regarding when 'mitigation measures' should be considered, RDC have left themselves vulnerable to being legally challenged due to their non-compliance with statutory regulations. I strongly object to RDC acceptance and consideration given to untimely mitigation measures submitted by the developer for site BEX9 (Spindlewood) without giving due care and attention to the environmental issues raised by local residents and the harmful effects this development will cause, both in terms of ecology and sustainable housing. My bungalow backs onto the proposed site and garden gets waterlogged in heavy rain.
RR/2017/1705/P DaSA Part II Policy BEX9 (Spindlewood)
As a result of the CJEU April 2018 ruling regarding when 'mitigation measures' should be considered, RDC have left themselves vulnerable to being legally challenged due to their non-compliance with statutory regulations. I strongly object to RDC acceptance and consideration given to untimely mitigation measures submitted by the developer for site BEX9 (Spindlewood) without giving due care and attention to the environmental issues raised by local residents and the harmful effects this development will cause, both in terms of ecology and sustainable housing. My bungalow backs onto the proposed site and garden gets waterlogged in heavy rain.