We are very concerned at the proposals for a new gypsy site and the potential anti-social and disruptive behaviour that we have experienced in the past (from the Downs and Glyne Gap) from unauthorised sites.

Including damage to property, thieving, negative impacts to the local environment and a general lack of care for their sites.

Mayo Lane and the wider Bexhill community is typically an area with an elderly population and many locals that I have spoken with have voiced their worry that they will not be able to leave their homes safely.

We have experienced the anti-social behaviour previously from unauthorised campsites and are unsure how Rother will be promoting a "peaceful and integrated co-existence" in line with the government guidance. Additionally we would be concerned about the extra strain on our local schools and health services.

We are confused as council tax payers as to why we should be paying for a new site that does not reflect what the community wants or needs, and also the potential impact to house prices in the area. I am sure that the community would prefer that the money invested for this site could be put to much better use in other areas.