Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23985

Received: 12/02/2017

Respondent: Maple Walk (South) Road Maintenance Scheme

Representation Summary:

Under the terms of the original development of the De La Warr Estate, frontagers are required to pay an annual sum towards road upkeep (and keep the frontages properly maintained and litter-free). The additional traffic represents a totally unacceptable burden upon the frontagers. There is no pavement on Maple Walk, and additional traffic also represents a risk to pedestrian safety.

We are fundamentally opposed to BX116.

Were some development to proceed notwithstanding our opposition, we comment upon paragraph (ii) of policy BEX9.

Vehicle and pedestrian entrances should be onto Barnhorn Road with no entry into or out of Spindlewood Drive.

Full text:

As a Committee, we have a responsibility to all those with a frontage (frontagers) onto Maple Walk (South). Similar committees represent the interests of the residents of other unadopted roads in the vicinity of the proposed development of BX116.

Under the terms of the original development of the De La Warr Estate, frontagers are required to pay an annual sum towards the upkeep of the road. They are also required to keep the frontages properly maintained and litter-free. The proposed development of BX116 seems to have been put forward without any regard to the special and historically significant nature of Maple Walk and the other private roads on the De La Warr Estate, nor of the impact upon the current and future residents. The additional traffic (and the damage to the road it will cause) represents a totally unacceptable burden upon the frontagers. They would face a considerable and enduring additional annual expense, plus a loss of amenity. There is no pavement on Maple Walk, and additional traffic (both during construction and thereafter) also represents a risk to pedestrian safety.

We are thus fundamentally opposed to the development of BX116. It is our view that no development of the site should go ahead.

Were some development to proceed notwithstanding our opposition, then given our responsibilities we should comment simply upon paragraph (ii) of policy BEX9.

Given the impact upon the unadopted roads (and upon Meads Road - which is narrow and not well maintained), in our considered judgement both the vehicle and pedestrian entrances should be onto Barnhorn Road, and there should be no entry into or out of Spindlewood Drive. Barnhorn Road is a trunk road and, although badly congested at peak times - a strong reason for opposing all the suggested ribbon development adjacent or close to the A259 - it is maintained at public expense to take a much higher traffic flow. (Closing the link between BX116 and Spindlewood Drive would be necessary to prevent its use as a rat-run to and from the A259 to avoid the Little Common roundabout.)