Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22930
Received: 13/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Stuart Painter
Disagree with Spindlewood Drive as a preferred site.
Several other sites which would better serve the proposed development-Sute BX124 could be increased where there will be a much larger self-sufficient structure developed i.e. schools, shops, medical services and more adequate access and road structure.
Meads Road is totally unacceptable and infrastructure in Little Common is already saturated and heavily polluted.
Additional houses here will add to the expelling of water storm and other urban areas that already flood so before any further moves are made on this site a full flood survey and appraisal should be carried out.
I disagree with BEX9 site reference BX116 Spindlewood Drive being a preferred site for housing development.
There are several other sites which would better serve the proposed development e.g. Site BX124 could be increased to house the whole 160 houses proposed on this site where there will be a much larger self-sufficient structure developed i.e. schools, shops, medical services and more adequate access and road structure.
The access into Meads Road is totally unacceptable and all of the infrastructure in Little Common is already saturated and heavily polluted.
Additional houses here will add to the expelling of water storm and other urban areas that are already showing signs of flooding so before any further moves are made on this site a full flood survey and appraisal should be carried out especially with continued global warming.