Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 22894

Received: 13/02/2017

Respondent: Mrs Rosemary Stammers

Representation Summary:

Site BX124 is preferred and feasible to have more development by developing options 2/3. Would be more beneficial for Bexhill residents and those living on the new site.

More suitable for development than other areas. It would have better access to Schools/GP's/shops/Hospital without the need to enter on to the A259 saving pollution/congestion.

Employment is very limited in Little Common, the construction of business areas within BX124 will be able to offer residents a livelihood close to their homes.

I believe there should not be further major developments in/around existing residential areas within Bexhill where infrastructure is already under strain.

Full text:

I, as do the vast majority of local residents, prefer the site Policy no. BX3 - site ref:
BX124 and feel that there is more feasibility for even more development within the site by also developing options 2/3. This would be more beneficial for all Bexhill residents and those who would be living on the new site.

Because of its location it is much more suitable for development than other areas of
Bexhill and Little Common. It would have a much better access to Schools, GP's, shops and the Conquest Hospital etc without the need to enter on to the A259 saving pollution and congestion either side of Little Common Roundabout.

Employment is very limited in the Little Common Area, the construction of business
areas within BX124 will be able to offer local residents a livelihood close to their homes without the need to clog up the already overstretched A259.

I believe there should not be any further major developments in or around existing
residential areas within Bexhill and Little Common who infrastructures are already under tremendous strain.