Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22886
Received: 14/02/2017
Respondent: Mr Alfred Powell
No, I do not agree to Policy BEX9.
I do not want to see any developments on this site (BX116) as there are more suitable sites (eg BX101 and BX124) for development of residential and affordable housing.
The infrastructure around BX116 is not adequate and is now frankly "saturated". It will seriously affect the quality of life and also have a massive impact on the health and wellbeing of residents living near BX116 site and all the "feeder/rat run" roads (Meads and Maple Walk, Maple Avenue, Clavering Walk, Cooden Sea Road, Herbrand Way and the Sluice Road).
No, I do not agree to Policy BEX9.
I do not want to see any developments on this site (BX116) as there are more suitable sites (eg BX101 and BX124) for development of residential and affordable housing.
The infrastructure around BX116 is not adequate and is now frankly "saturated" and will not be able to cope with any further high density housing and traffic and it will seriously affect the quality of life and also have a massive impact on the health and wellbeing of residents living near BX116 site and all the "feeder/rat run" roads (Meads and Maple Walk, Maple Avenue, Clavering Walk, Cooden Sea Road, Herbrand Way and the Sluice Road).