Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22743
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Ms Ruby Pringle
Do not Agree. I do not believe that the preferred site for Peasmarsh (PS24) is suitable for development. It has previously been rejected and these reasons still remain. A single large site would be detrimental to the village character and to the quality of life to the immediate neighbours.
Three sites lend themselves to a more desirable outcome to the village. PS5, PS6 and PS75.
Do not Agree. I do not believe that the preferred site for Peasmarsh (PS24) is suitable for development. It has previously been rejected and these reasons still remain. A single large site would be detrimental to the village character and to the quality of life to the immediate neighbours.
Three sites lend themselves to a more desirable outcome to the village. PS5, PS6 and PS75.