Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22736
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Mary Pringle
Do not agree. I do not believe that the preferred site for Peasmarsh (PS24) is suitable for development. It has previously been rejected and these reasons still remain. A single large site would be detrimental to the village character and to the quality of lie to the immediate neighbours. Three sites lends itself to the more desirable outcome to the village. PS5, PS6 and PS75.
Do not agree. I do not believe that the preferred site for Peasmarsh (PS24) is suitable for development. It has previously been rejected and these reasons still remain. A single large site would be detrimental to the village character and to the quality of lie to the immediate neighbours. Three sites lends itself to the more desirable outcome to the village. PS5, PS6 and PS75.