Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22716
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Brenda Simpson
Representation Summary:
I do not agree that BEX5 Knole Road Bexhill should be included as a 'preferred' site for housing development at all and should be removed as such. Over the last 14yrs = 3 failed attempts at development = planning appeals and High Court cases = very costly for RDC's Council Tax payers.
Full text:
I do not agree that BEX5 Knole Road Bexhill should be included as a 'preferred' site for housing development at all and should be removed as such. Over the last 14yrs = 3 failed attempts at development = planning appeals and High Court cases = very costly for RDC's Council Tax payers.