Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22702
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Miss Judith Rogers
No I do not support a specific policy for the re-instatement of this line. This document is supposed to be about what is necessary in the Rother District and not about tourist attractions. If you include one prospective tourist attraction, then you must include all of them.
You make no mention of the, already contentious, issues in the village of Robertsbridge of traffic and parking. This should have no impact on either the amount of traffic in the village or on the number of car parking spaces available. Commuters already line the streets to park free.
No I do not support a specific policy for the re-instatement of this line. This document is supposed to be about what is necessary in the Rother District and not about tourist attractions. If you include one prospective tourist attraction, then you must include all of them.
You make no mention of the, already contentious, issues in the village of Robertsbridge of traffic and parking. This should have no impact on either the amount of traffic in the village or on the number of car parking spaces available. Commuters already line the streets to park free.