Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22672
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: CPRE Sussex
Representation Summary:
Preferred site FO12 should not be included as it constitutes the green gap between the communities of Beckley and Four Oaks. Logic would argue for sites BE10 and/or FO13, and roadside development on FO8 and/or FO4.
Full text:
Preferred site FO12 should not be included as it constitutes the green gap between the communities of Beckley and Four Oaks. Logic would argue for sites BE10 and/or FO13, and roadside development on FO8 and/or FO4.