Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22620
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Hugh Kermode
I do not agree with the proposed development boundary. It should remain as drawn in 2006, with an Exception Site at ID6 - preserving the character of Iden and preventing "creep".
The development boundary (2006) was a factor in the purchasing decisions of several properties in Iden and have part of the property searches. Development of ID1a will have a negative impact on the value of many properties.
The proposal for ID1a will raise housing density to approx 31 dwellings per hectare in this part of Iden - par with a Garden City and inappropriate for a rural village.
I do not agree with the proposed development boundary. It should remain as drawn in 2006, with an Exception Site at ID6 - preserving the character of Iden and preventing "creep".
The development boundary (2006) was a factor in the purchasing decisions of several properties in Iden and have part of the property searches. Development of ID1a will have a negative impact on the value of many properties.
The proposal for ID1a will raise housing density to approx 31 dwellings per hectare in this part of Iden - par with a Garden City and inappropriate for a rural village.