Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22458
Received: 07/02/2017
Respondent: Mr John Blackmore
I do not agree with the requirements of BEX3 as it does not go far enough.
The development at site BX124 should be expanded to include Option 2. It would be a better site for affordable housing because it is nearer to existing schools ,medical facilities and employment opportunities.
It would also avoid the inevitable road congestion that would result from development on several of the other proposed sites.
I do not agree with the requirements of BEX3 as it does not go far enough.
The development at site BX124 should be expanded to include Option 2. It would be a better site for affordable housing because it is nearer to existing schools ,medical facilities and employment opportunities.
It would also avoid the inevitable road congestion that would result from development on several of the other proposed sites.