Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22456
Received: 07/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Leonora Blackmore
I do not agree with the preferred sites and in particular BX116.
This site is unnecessary and any further development around Little Common is excessive bearing in mind Barnhorn Green which is already agreed. Even that development adds over 300 new homes where infrastructure is already at breaking point. It is shameful that it is being allowed to proceed without the inclusion of additional facilities that were originally intended. It demonstrates yet again that initial "planning" can rarely be trusted and the impact of developments give no regard to the existing community and environmental issues.
BX116 should be permanently cancelled.
I do not agree with the preferred sites that have been proposed, and in particular disagree with BX116.
This site is totally unnecessary and any further development around Little Common (other than a few small windfall sites) is excessive bearing in mind the Barnhorn Green development which is already agreed. Even that development will alone add over 300 new homes to an area whose infrastructure is already at breaking point. It is shameful that it is being allowed to proceed without the inclusion of additional facilities that were originally intended. . It demonstrates yet again that initial "planning" can rarely be trusted and the impact of such developments give no regard to the existing community and environmental issues.
BX116 should be permanently cancelled.