Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22454
Received: 07/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Leonora Blackmore
I do not agree with the requirements of BEX3 as it stands.
Site BEX124 is clearly the best for any large scale development as it has excellent access to a wide range of facilities and will make the best of the existing local infrastructure.
I believe that this site should be even expanded as it presents none of the disruption that would occur with other "preferred" sites.
This would negate the need for development of several of the other sites, particularly BX116 which is totally unsuitable for several reasons. These are explained more fully in my comments on Qu 35
I do not agree with the requirements of BEX3 as it stands.
Site BEX124 is clearly the best for any large scale development as it has excellent access to a wide range of facilities and will make the best of the existing local infrastructure.
I believe that this site should be even expanded as it presents none of the disruption that would occur with other "preferred" sites.
This would negate the need for development of several of the other sites, particularly BX116 which is totally unsuitable for several reasons. These are explained more fully in my comments on Qu 35