Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22309
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Burnett
Sites at BX 30, BX 64, BX 81, BX 116 seem to be the least suitable sites for expansion as per the existing suggestions. Reasons for caution: too high density; too much new traffic created; too much wildlife disturbed or destroyed; too little parking provision; 44% new housing stock deemed too small as per GIA (Gross Internal Area) requirements; inadequate green spaces; insufficient play areas; insufficient elderly and mobility-impaired homes; too much noise and light pollution; too much risk of flooding and not adequately addressed!
Sites at BX 30, BX 64, BX 81, BX 116 seem to be the least suitable sites for expansion as per the existing suggestions. Reasons for caution: too high density; too much new traffic created; too much wildlife disturbed or destroyed; too little parking provision; 44% new housing stock deemed too small as per GIA (Gross Internal Area) requirements; inadequate green spaces; insufficient play areas; insufficient elderly and mobility-impaired homes; too much noise and light pollution; too much risk of flooding and not adequately addressed!