Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 22215

Received: 14/02/2017

Respondent: Mr Kelvin Fosberry

Representation Summary:

BO16 is favoured by policy BR01 as it is already part in developer ownership. BO1 is the only rejected site with suffix 'not at this time'. Ostler Field/BO17 strategy will be employed. A developed BO16 will provide access to BO1 for a hidden agenda. The stated importance of AONB and amenity for Hawthorns/Tillingham, Chitcombe Rd as reasons for rejection of BO1 will eventually be downgraded once lack of access is removed from the argument.

Full text:

BO16 is favoured by policy BR01 as it is already part in developer ownership. BO1 is the only rejected site with suffix 'not at this time'. Ostler Field/BO17 strategy will be employed. A developed BO16 will provide access to BO1 for a hidden agenda. The stated importance of AONB and amenity for Hawthorns/Tillingham, Chitcombe Rd as reasons for rejection of BO1 will eventually be downgraded once lack of access is removed from the argument.