Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22190
Received: 17/02/2017
Respondent: Ms Christine Banwell
No, I do not agree. Is there evidence of a demand for this number of houses? The infrastructure is not geared up for this- where are the jobs, public transport, roads network, schools, doctors surgeries? Peasmarsh has poor facilities now- slow broadband, no street lighting, poor roads, unreliable utilities. Putting additional pressure on these networks will be detrimental. My property suffers from very poor drainage, and flooding, from land adjacent to the proposed development, and this will be directly affected. Alternative sites- PS6/5, or PS3 would be slightly more suitable but small (5-6 houses)developments only.
No, I do not agree. Is there evidence of a demand for this number of houses? The infrastructure is not geared up for this- where are the jobs, public transport, roads network, schools, doctors surgeries? Peasmarsh has poor facilities now- slow broadband, no street lighting, poor roads, unreliable utilities. Putting additional pressure on these networks will be detrimental. My property suffers from very poor drainage, and flooding, from land adjacent to the proposed development, and this will be directly affected. Alternative sites- PS6/5, or PS3 would be slightly more suitable but small (5-6 houses)developments only.