Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22067
Received: 14/01/2017
Respondent: Mr Mark Harris
Previous applications for this site were rejected due to the type and density of housing proposed, considered not suitable for the area. Whilst I can only speak for myself, I believe a more sympathetic view would be taken by local residents if a more suitable scheme was proposed, such as retirement properties or bungalows. Whilst we all have to accept the need to additional housing these days, in this beautiful area residents will clearly fight hard against plans for inappropriate housing scheme's.
Previous applications for this site were rejected due to the type and density of housing proposed, considered not suitable for the area. Whilst I can only speak for myself, I believe a more sympathetic view would be taken by local residents if a more suitable scheme was proposed, such as retirement properties or bungalows. Whilst we all have to accept the need to additional housing these days, in this beautiful area residents will clearly fight hard against plans for inappropriate housing scheme's.