Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 21982
Received: 24/12/2016
Respondent: Mr Timothy Day
I do not agree with this proposed development. There is insufficient access for works traffic along Meads Road or Maple Walk. Maple Walk and Maple Avenue are both unadopted roads and maintained through residents contributions. Any additional traffic via these roads will make the road surface deteriorate quicker and therefore cost the residents, of which I am one, more to maintain. This village is crowded enough already and any further development should take place on the outskirts of the village. I also recommend that a bypass of little common be urgently considered to reduce traffic congestion on the A259.
I do not agree with this proposed development. There is insufficient access for works traffic along Meads Road or Maple Walk. Maple Walk and Maple Avenue are both unadopted roads and maintained through residents contributions. Any additional traffic via these roads will make the road surface deteriorate quicker and therefore cost the residents, of which I am one, more to maintain. This village is crowded enough already and any further development should take place on the outskirts of the village. I also recommend that a bypass of little common be urgently considered to reduce traffic congestion on the A259.