Object
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21574
Received: 27/09/2013
Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Whilst we broadly support the aim of this change, as with Mod 16.1, mixed use creeps in here without any restraint all. Mixed use development has to be a last resort after all alternatives have been explored. It would be helpful also to have a definition of what is meant by strategic since what was a proto definition in the previous version has been removed in this latest one.
If particularly a village is to be sustainable and to remain so, there needs always to be economic activity and that demands sites. Otherwise a village will no longer be sustainable.
Whilst we broadly support the aim of this change, as with Mod 16.1, mixed use creeps in here without any restraint all. Mixed use development has to be a last resort after all alternatives have been explored. It would be helpful also to have a definition of what is meant by strategic since what was a proto definition in the previous version has been removed in this latest one.
If particularly a village is to be sustainable and to remain so, there needs always to be economic activity and that demands sites. Otherwise a village will atrophy and no longer be sustainable.