Object

Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 21491

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The main modifications are not legally compliant as the plan does not align with national policy. Neither does the plan reflect the local Catsfield Plan. The main modifications do not reflect local needs, so are not justified. The plan is not sound as the proposed allocation for Catsfield is disproportionate to other villages. The way in which numbers of dwellings have been dispersed across the district results in the plan not meeting the objectives of the overall policy.

Full text:

The main modifications are not legally compliant as the plan does not align with national policy. Neither does the plan reflect the local Catsfield Plan. The main modifications do not reflect local needs, so are not justified. The plan is not sound as the proposed allocation for Catsfield is disproportionate to other villages. The way in which numbers of dwellings have been dispersed across the district results in the plan not meeting the objectives of the overall policy.