Object
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21462
Received: 27/09/2013
Respondent: Mr John Overall
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
although the tables look the same at first glance there is a fundamental difference.there is no minimum column on the modification. this has the effect in Catsfield of increasing our allocation from 0 to 30 up to 47 dwellings. an increase of 56% at 30 rising through 370% at 10 to infinity% at 0.
I consider this change to be illegal and to go against the policy of reasonable change within a small village. It goes against Policy 7.41 ,7.43
although the tables look the same at first glance there is a fundamental difference.there is no minimum column on the modification. this has the effect in Catsfield of increasing our allocation from 0 to 30 up to 47 dwellings. an increase of 56% at 30 rising through 370% at 10 to infinity% at 0.
I consider this change to be illegal and to go against the policy of reasonable change within a small village. It goes against Policy 7.41 ,7.43